Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

What does Val McDermid mean?

141 replies

achillestoes · 09/08/2022 11:53

“My view of gender politics is you bring people into the tent. Womanhood is a big tent. It embraces me and Kim Kardashian. There’s certainly room in that tent for the trans women I know.”

Translate. Right answers only.

OP posts:
ScreechingEchoChamber · 10/08/2022 12:03

That's a powerful post Serena. I am on board with everything you say there, believe me. (Except I don't know what an AWA is?).

I was speaking to a friend this morning about rapists in prison with women. Anger is an understandable response; we are dealing with negligence, misogyny, cowardice, political disingenuousness, wilful blindness and mendacity that yes results in real harm. But as ever to go beyond that and get through to the people that matter we have to rise above.

It's not through any kind of righteousness I say that; it's just pragmatism.

We are getting there. Hold on tight x

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 10/08/2022 12:19

Blimey @SerenaVanDerWoodsenHumphrey I'm also in Scotland and very worried about what's happening to women here too. Now I just read the Times article.

"I can’t imagine many men shedding their power enough to put on a frock just so they could get closer to women."

Just because VM can't imagine it? Men don't even need to put on a frock, they say they are trans and the doors open. It's already happened to vulnerable women in prisons and hospitals. It's documented. But I guess VM would rather not know.

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 10/08/2022 12:29

Oh, and it doesn't need to be many men. There aren't many trans women either. But if there are only a few of each then women are equally likely to bump into both. When a woman sees someone she recognises as male in women's space it's roughly equally likely to be someone whose intentions are not honest. That's how small numbers work.

Facts are not kind but statistics and probabilities can be a real bitch.

terryleather · 10/08/2022 12:33

SerenaVanDerWoodsenHumphrey · 10/08/2022 11:51

Floisme: we've still had the likes of 'dim' 'thick' 'stupid' 'bitchy' (which normally gets shot down pretty quickly on here) and 'piece of shit'.

ScreechingEchoChamber: Calling anyone a piece of shit is unacceptable. And yes, insults are unnecessary. VM is clearly intelligent.

I was the one who wrote “piece of shit” and I apologise for the wording but not for the sentiment.

The all-out, long-term assault on women’s rights in Scotland is personal to me. I'm somewhat privileged and insulated, but it has hurt and continues to hurt people I love and care about including (and disproportionately) some who are NOT privileged and insulated. It has drained and diminished a country I love. It has redirected energy and resources which are needed for the basic work of protecting people, of building a better society, of mitigating the harm of events like Brexit and COVID and letting people live and thrive. It has redirected resources which belong to everyone in order to help men and hurt women in a society where women are already systemically disadvantaged.

It's not OK.

I am angry, and I am bone weary. I hate what Val McDermid is doing. I hate the effect it has on real people. (Yes, woman are real people.) I hate what Scotland appears to have become, what it looks like to the world.

I read Val McDermid's piece in The Times this past weekend (Val McDermid: fears over trans rights overblown) which OldCrone linked above. Lots of people in Scotland (and beyond) read it. It reduced a very old friend of mine, a longtime Scottish feminist and LGBTQ2IA2+ activist, to tears of despair. Most people who’ve been on here for a bit will recognise the (well-worn, dishonest and intentionally misleading) script: women critiquing the negative impact of policies like self-ID are motivated solely by the fact that transwomen threaten their womanhood/femininity!!!!! Aiiiiiiiiiiii, however, am evolved and so transwomen do not threaten maiiiiiiiiiii womanhood.

This comes on the heels of a campaign Val McDermid ran earlier this year: she spoke at the annual Lesbian Lives conference in Cork, where Susan Stryker was the keynote speaker. Of course McDermid has the right to speak where and when she likes, and if the best candidate that Lesbian Lives could find to give their keynote address happened to be a transwoman, then have at it.

The problem is, though, Stryker is not "just" a transwoman. Stryker is an anti-woman activist (AWA) and is well known in the USA as an outspoken anti-black racist. For these reasons alone, Stryker was an inappropriate choice to lead the conference. When McDermid was questioned about her support of Stryker as keynote speaker, though, she refused to engage and denounced and blocked anyone asking questions one the basis that they were "transphobic".

The principle that a transwoman - ANY transwoman, however egregious personally and politically - should and must lead a lesbian conference was the only thing that mattered to Val. Anybody raising any other concerns was shut down and blocked by Val. Please stop and think for a minute - and if you know a trans person you can speak with honestly, ask them: should trans people be supported in doing and saying absolutely anything just because they are trans? Or is that assumption, in and of itself, an example of (possibly "benign") transphobia?

Val McDermid is an AWA. She is virulently misogynist, whether she actively seeks to harm women as a group and to minimise and hide the structural, systemic damage done every day to women as a group or whether she "just" downplays and attempts to silence all criticism of harm to women in her pursuit of money and fame. I don’t know why she is this way and honestly I can no longer spare the energy to give her the benefit of the doubt or to care. I can’t reason with or influence her if she simply blocks everyone who disagrees and clamps her hands over her ears and sings “na na na na I can’t hear you!” while continuing to use her power, visibility, and privilege to do harm.

And make no mistake, McDermid is doing real, material damage. Real harm. Irreversible harm. To people. To women. Disproportionately, to disadvantaged women.

While ca$hing in on claiming to be a feminist and claiming to care about Scotland. And she actively uses her power and privilege to shut down any criticism or dissent.

It’s not OK.

I’m never going to say or think that it’s OK.

Thanks for reading, anyone who made it this far. Sorry again about the bad word.

Well said Serena

GibbonsGoatsGibbons · 10/08/2022 12:52

SerenaVanDerWoodsenHumphrey
Thank you for articulating the miserable frustration & despair I also feel.
solidarity

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 10/08/2022 12:54

PS that was meant to be a supportive "blimey" for @SerenaVanDerWoodsenHumphrey Smile

ShoddyCourtBundles · 10/08/2022 12:59

I'm not in Scotland but l found that a very powerful post, Serena. Thank you.

MangyInseam · 10/08/2022 13:24

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 10/08/2022 12:19

Blimey @SerenaVanDerWoodsenHumphrey I'm also in Scotland and very worried about what's happening to women here too. Now I just read the Times article.

"I can’t imagine many men shedding their power enough to put on a frock just so they could get closer to women."

Just because VM can't imagine it? Men don't even need to put on a frock, they say they are trans and the doors open. It's already happened to vulnerable women in prisons and hospitals. It's documented. But I guess VM would rather not know.

I think lots of people have this sense of it. The idea of men doing this thing where they almost emasculate themselves, in a cultural sense, in order to gain power or influence over women, seems very weird and alien. I'm heterosexual, I find it weird just on the basis that being attracted sexually to a man behaving that way is something I find very difficult to imagine, and I'm generally pretty imaginative.

I think sometimes maybe some men actually catch on to this more quickly. I saw an interview Joe Rogan did once, and I can't even remember who he was talking to other than it was a woman, but they were talking about male feminists. He had very little time for them, admitted that maybe some just thought they were doing the right thing, but he clearly thought that in fact these were largely men who were not normally attractive to women, and were using the "feminist" label as a kind of camouflage to get close to women mainly for sexual purposes.

Which also seemed crazy to me, but I wonder after watching it, maybe being a man he has some insight there that I am not privy to. Rogan is in a lot of ways just a regular kind of male person, and I found it so interesting that to him it seemed completely obvious that this was a role some (or a lot) of men played in order to get access to sexual partners. Since then I've talked to a few different men I know, from different walks of life, and none of them seemed to find that hard to believe either.

Pluvia · 10/08/2022 13:52

Serenavanderwoodsenhumphrey, thank you for detailing your reasons/ position. I feel exactly the same way about other lesbians in my area who are fighting to ensure that men have access to lesbian and women's space. Perhaps the time has come to stop being polite. Linda Riley, Nancy Kelley, VM — they are all powerful lesbians actively working against lesbians and women and they deserve major censure.

nettie434 · 11/08/2022 09:01

That was a powerful post Serenavanderwoodsenhumphrey. I didn't know about Susan Stryker or Val McDermid blocking people either so I've learned something too. It's quite sad to think that someone who is clearly incredibly talented and politically aware should be so intolerant of other viewpoints but Val McDermid is very clearly part of the establishment now, unlike in her youth.

I read the Mermaids Singing book ages ago. I suppose it's just as well for Val that those most likely to complain are more likely to read young adult fiction/fantasy than detective stories.

SudocremOnEverything · 11/08/2022 09:50

The thing is, ‘putting on a frock’ does not cause trans women to shed male power. It almost amplifies that power in particular ways.

It’s disingenuous to pretend that the things that disempower women in society function the same way when male humans do or approximate them. They just don’t.

achillestoes · 11/08/2022 10:01

I get it, Serena. We have to be civil because it’s the way we get things done. That doesn’t mean we can’t be angry.

OP posts:
YouSetTheTone · 11/08/2022 13:58

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

YouSetTheTone · 11/08/2022 14:17

I assume I was deleted for (mistakenly) using a banned alternative description for a transwoman. I did not say anything inappropriate or personal against Val McDermid.

RhannionKPSS · 11/08/2022 17:45

SerenaVanDerWoodsenHumphrey · 10/08/2022 11:51

Floisme: we've still had the likes of 'dim' 'thick' 'stupid' 'bitchy' (which normally gets shot down pretty quickly on here) and 'piece of shit'.

ScreechingEchoChamber: Calling anyone a piece of shit is unacceptable. And yes, insults are unnecessary. VM is clearly intelligent.

I was the one who wrote “piece of shit” and I apologise for the wording but not for the sentiment.

The all-out, long-term assault on women’s rights in Scotland is personal to me. I'm somewhat privileged and insulated, but it has hurt and continues to hurt people I love and care about including (and disproportionately) some who are NOT privileged and insulated. It has drained and diminished a country I love. It has redirected energy and resources which are needed for the basic work of protecting people, of building a better society, of mitigating the harm of events like Brexit and COVID and letting people live and thrive. It has redirected resources which belong to everyone in order to help men and hurt women in a society where women are already systemically disadvantaged.

It's not OK.

I am angry, and I am bone weary. I hate what Val McDermid is doing. I hate the effect it has on real people. (Yes, woman are real people.) I hate what Scotland appears to have become, what it looks like to the world.

I read Val McDermid's piece in The Times this past weekend (Val McDermid: fears over trans rights overblown) which OldCrone linked above. Lots of people in Scotland (and beyond) read it. It reduced a very old friend of mine, a longtime Scottish feminist and LGBTQ2IA2+ activist, to tears of despair. Most people who’ve been on here for a bit will recognise the (well-worn, dishonest and intentionally misleading) script: women critiquing the negative impact of policies like self-ID are motivated solely by the fact that transwomen threaten their womanhood/femininity!!!!! Aiiiiiiiiiiii, however, am evolved and so transwomen do not threaten maiiiiiiiiiii womanhood.

This comes on the heels of a campaign Val McDermid ran earlier this year: she spoke at the annual Lesbian Lives conference in Cork, where Susan Stryker was the keynote speaker. Of course McDermid has the right to speak where and when she likes, and if the best candidate that Lesbian Lives could find to give their keynote address happened to be a transwoman, then have at it.

The problem is, though, Stryker is not "just" a transwoman. Stryker is an anti-woman activist (AWA) and is well known in the USA as an outspoken anti-black racist. For these reasons alone, Stryker was an inappropriate choice to lead the conference. When McDermid was questioned about her support of Stryker as keynote speaker, though, she refused to engage and denounced and blocked anyone asking questions one the basis that they were "transphobic".

The principle that a transwoman - ANY transwoman, however egregious personally and politically - should and must lead a lesbian conference was the only thing that mattered to Val. Anybody raising any other concerns was shut down and blocked by Val. Please stop and think for a minute - and if you know a trans person you can speak with honestly, ask them: should trans people be supported in doing and saying absolutely anything just because they are trans? Or is that assumption, in and of itself, an example of (possibly "benign") transphobia?

Val McDermid is an AWA. She is virulently misogynist, whether she actively seeks to harm women as a group and to minimise and hide the structural, systemic damage done every day to women as a group or whether she "just" downplays and attempts to silence all criticism of harm to women in her pursuit of money and fame. I don’t know why she is this way and honestly I can no longer spare the energy to give her the benefit of the doubt or to care. I can’t reason with or influence her if she simply blocks everyone who disagrees and clamps her hands over her ears and sings “na na na na I can’t hear you!” while continuing to use her power, visibility, and privilege to do harm.

And make no mistake, McDermid is doing real, material damage. Real harm. Irreversible harm. To people. To women. Disproportionately, to disadvantaged women.

While ca$hing in on claiming to be a feminist and claiming to care about Scotland. And she actively uses her power and privilege to shut down any criticism or dissent.

It’s not OK.

I’m never going to say or think that it’s OK.

Thanks for reading, anyone who made it this far. Sorry again about the bad word.

Thank you for your excellent post, I know exactly how you feel. I’m angry& embarrassed about the state of my country at the moment, but i am hearted by the amount of women who are pushing back with all their strengths. 💚🤍💜

Xenia · 11/08/2022 17:48

VM used a particularly bad analogy there - into the tent, with visions of brownies and girl guides having to let boys into the real tent who are self declaring as girls so they can get some non consensual s ex with the teenage girls. Letting people with a p enis into the tent with women is not a great idea. Talk to each other in a place where we can keep those with a p enis at bay and defend ourselves though is fine - talking is always good.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page