It's so great that Mordaunt's flexible relationship with the truth is coming out so prominently in the news. Surely she can't be selected now. After Boris, the biggest requirement for the new leader is integrity.
I'm not convinced about Sunak's economic policy though, particularly holding off on tax cuts due to inflation.
There are 2 different types of inflation: supply-driven (cost of production going up) and demand-driven (people feeing rich, and buying more).
Our current inflation is supply-driven (the war in Ukraine reducing availability of various foods, sanctions in Russia reducing oil and gas, Brexit putting barriers in place for imports as well as exports).
Reducing tax makes the other type of inflation (demand-driven) worse because people feel richer and buy more unnecessary stuff. But it doesn't affect supply-driven inflation: it's just making it possible for people to keep buying goods they absolutely need (food and fuel).
Increasing wages could cause an inflation spiral, because once one sector has a big increase then all the others will have to follow, and the extra wage cost further increases the cost of production.
Reducing tax would mean less money coming into the coffers, which is a problem - since we need to pay back the huge cost of covid - but that's nothing to do with supply-driven inflation so shouldn't be artificially linked to it.
I can't work out whether Sunak doesn't really understand economics, or whether he's just over-simplifying the message because he doesn't think voters do (which is quite patronising). I think he might be trying a bit of a sleight-of-hand: blaming inflation for not cutting taxes, rather than all the money spent on covid policies..
I like Kemi's focus on supporting companies: creating more value is the only way out of this situation. But she wants to reduce tax by finding inefficiencies in the public sector, which I think is a non-starter. Everyone has been trying to do that already for years and schools and hospitals in particular already be cut to the bone, and only just keeping the lights on. I'm also very against her suggestion of 're-negotiating' net-zero by 2050. Climate change is urgent, and can no longer be pushed back.
Tom Tugendhat seems all talk and no ideas. He's too like Starmer.
So I think Truss is probably the best bet. She's experienced, not afraid to stand up to foreign powers, intends to cut taxes, plans to fund that by borrowing to cover the covid costs over a longer period of time, committed to net-zero by 2050, and didn't hesitate to stand up for women when that was a very unpopular move. It does worry me that she says covid is a 1 in 100 year event - I think that's optimistic, especially with climate change likely to bring many more equally expensive 1 in 100 year events over the next few years. But borrowing is probably still the right thing to do.