@LittlestBaoBun
Yes, I see where you are coming from. I think everyone could be kinder, on all sides.
I strongly suspect that there are things that we might not agree on (for example, I think medically puberty blockers do cause harm, based on the studies and side effects, but whether they cause the least harm in a child who is really struggling is far more open to debate and has to be resolved on a case by case basis after exploration of the causes of distress).
Being totally honest, I don't think that TWAW, if what is meant by TWAW is a proxy for "female" (as some of the more vocal and extreme trans campaigners would have it) but I have no issue with referring to someone as their preferred pronouns or with a trans woman referring to themselves as a woman, or accepting trans women as women socially. For example in terms of the female/woman distinction, I don't believe that Emily Bridges (the trans cyclist) should compete against natal females, because it simply isn't a fair competition having experienced male puberty, but I think it is unreasonable and unnecessary to keep calling her a man against her express wishes on a public forum (which is what sometimes happens on here). She should have a separate category open to her where she can be celebrated as a trans woman, ditto Lia Thomas - I think this is the middle way.
I think there is also a middle way open on single sex spaces, but I think it does require compassion on both sides (and quite possibly a healthy dose of third/separate spaces for some scenarios). You only have to look at the threats JK Rowling has received (even if you disagree with her, she doesn't deserve rape or death) to see that it isn't just GC women who don't cover themselves in glory. I don't think anyone benefits from locking up a fully transitioned trans woman who kills her abusive husband with men, but equally I don't think we can just take it on face value that Jane (who was called Kevin 3 weeks ago) should be allowed to perform mammograms unchaperoned; it's only reasonable to build safeguarding into processes and to respect the wishes of those females who do find it traumatising to encounter someone who doesn't pass very well in a space in which they are extremely vulnerable, which means having some single sex spaces and options.
This will sometimes mean that someone who is a TW won't be treated as if they were a natal female - extra checks will be needed, some natal women will opt out. Similarly, I don't care what a trans woman and a natal female call their relationship, if it is also acceptable for a female to only want to date females if this is her preference - she does not require coercion or reeducation.
I think a lot of women on here feel very threatened, because we now exist in a climate in which a minority of trans activists call us transphobic whatever we say and wish violence on us. I think that "be kind" has been used far too many times to mean "shut up, you cannot talk about this, it doesn't matter what words you use". As a result, some GC women have adopted "let's not be kind at all" in comments on here, which diminishes us.
I thank you for your considered thoughts. Where children are concerned, I think kindness and compassion are key and it has been really helpful hearing your views - I agree that in a lot of cases you can be compassionate and supportive and treat your child with respect and dignity (and listen, even if you don't agree) without actively encouraging an irreversible transition before 18.