Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Julie Bindel & venue for MVAW talk in Nottingham

256 replies

ifIwerenotanandroid · 24/06/2022 20:18

twitter.com/bindelj/status/1540377548387131392

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
CompleteGinasaur · 02/07/2022 15:12

Sorry to shamelessly fangirl, but Allison Bailey just donated £100! Feels like double digging! (sorry, bad gardening joke..)

lovelyweathertoday · 02/07/2022 15:22

The council really are this arrogant. They are fully stonewalled and don't believe the Forstater judgement applies to them.

I am livid that taxpayers (I.e. my) money is going to be spent defending this.

TastefulRainbowUnicorn · 02/07/2022 15:25

The council really are this arrogant. They are fully stonewalled and don't believe the Forstater judgement applies to them.

I don’t understand this. Have they no lawyers working for them? Are they ignoring the lawyers? Have they got the financial resources to play legal chicken with a bunch of women doing crowdfunding?

lovelyweathertoday · 02/07/2022 15:46

Hard to say, but no, they are skint and selling off our land and properties to try to balance the books.

I suspect there's been no further statements because they are waiting for legal action before getting more involved.

SolasAnla · 02/07/2022 18:31

TastefulRainbowUnicorn · 02/07/2022 15:25

The council really are this arrogant. They are fully stonewalled and don't believe the Forstater judgement applies to them.

I don’t understand this. Have they no lawyers working for them? Are they ignoring the lawyers? Have they got the financial resources to play legal chicken with a bunch of women doing crowdfunding?

The senior managers risk little to nothing when betting with council money. They will get paid salary and their pensions will be paid over when the time comes. And they get the whole resources of the council to mount a defence.
Its a public body so they have not bought in or invested personal money nor so they get any type of share price linked renumeration.
They will be indemnified as they are acting as an agent of the council being sued and/or will have paid for an insurance policy (from public funds) which will pay out for legal costs and damages if they are found to be at fault.

They may suffer reputational damage but would not usually be at risk of loosing their jobs.

Senior management should follow the internal legal advice but there is a risk that legal will be ignored or worse legal give the answer their manager wants to hear because the instruction is find a way to do X. If legal itsself has been stonewalled the advice bias may have resulted in a belief that the council could create a banned persons list.
In the case of being sued external advice would be beneficial as the supplier has back that advice with an insurance policy. So if the council loose they would in turn have a claim against incorrect advice. (Provided the staff told the full story).

Ereshkigalangcleg · 02/07/2022 18:46

Nearly hitting the second stretch target after a few hours.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread