@NellWilsonsWhiteHair
I find it plausible the entire story is fabricated just to stoke division.
The OP was a question asked on a legal board in Reddit. That's a really big reach, to suggest someone posted it there and that I lifted it and copied to MN, just to stoke division. Rather reminiscent of how TRAs defended the Wi Spa incident. They said it never even happened...until the police charged him.
And you say the NB person in the swimsuit was maliciously reported, whilst you also acknowledge they may or may not have been fully covered.
If you agree they may not have been fully covered, how is the report of indecency malicious?