One of the many points have found difficult is that we have encountered three members of staff who I think do understand the issues and did appear to initially listen to us. One called it a “minefield” and that from what I had sent him, he said he was leaning towards watchful waiting. At this point, the school’s own guidance “was being drafted” and I was hopeful that a more balanced approach would be adopted. Instead, I found via our SAR that the guidance has a paragraph at the end, presumably on the back of the type of information I had sent the school, as they had claimed to be unaware of these issues, which states:
”Further information
The linked pdf does not represent the views of or approach taken by [school] The article, on gender dysphoria serves to help those professionals who are supporting young people to understand that there may be parents/carers who feel that an ʻaffirmative approachʼ is unhelpful and that their child is gender dysphoric rather than trans”
The linked pdf is this one from TT:
www.transgendertrend.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Current-Evidence-in-the-Treatment-of-Gender-Dysphoric-Children-and-Young-People.pdf
What are they even saying in that paragraph? That they don’t believe gender dysphoria exists, that they just believe in the gendered soul or similar?
One of the other staff members spent a meeting telling us all about the increase in girls presenting with gender distress and how so many are autistic etc and we were so relieved that someone at the school finally seemed to really get it. The last one initially told me that the Year Head’s actions had been inappropriate and unprofessional and that the school should remain neutral.
Then these staff members very quickly shifted position and started following the school line that they support the child’s wishes and centre the views of the child, without any mention of the advice we had been given or acknowledging our safeguarding concerns, and we were lost. From that point, there was nothing we could say that would be listened to by anyone. I could have sympathy if they were told in no uncertain terms that they needed to follow the school line, but 2 of them went beyond that and told the most outrageous lies about my husband and myself during their interviews with the Head while our complaint was being investigated. Fortunately we have ample emails to refute the claims (and these are, in theory, being looked at in our appeal) but it was gutting to see that staff we had, for a short period trusted, lie this way.
The while thing is such a mess and LGBTYS have an awful lot to answer for.