@Tiphaine
I agree with all those saying it took them a while to get over their female socialisation and just call a man a man, but we got there and PP's forthright honesty helped us. You get called a transphobic terf for any minor infraction of the dogma. If I'm going to be called a bigot and lectured by an achingly obnoxious MRA scrote because I used 'transwoman' instead of 'trans woman', I'll just use 'man' and be done with it. Might as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb.
Interesting. I used to get a lot of weird corrections about a decade ago when I first began studying the trans movement. The acceptable terminology changed every week, and if you used the previous week's acceptable terminology, you were 'educated' on how ignorant you were.
The goal is to make people spend resources on tiptoeing around the minefield of words and ultimately the acceptable words will be so opaque that they can't be used for debating at all as nobody knows what is being said.
But of course now even the word 'woman' is like that, and there is no acceptable word for the female sex at all. Makes fighting sex-based oppression hard as I keep saying.
On Posie Parker: My own stance is that I don't necessarily have to approve of everything some activist does or believes in order to support her voice on specific issues. There are many areas where working with partial coalitions is necessary. It doesn't cause permanent marriages and it shouldn't paint everyone with the same brush.
Life is complicated, people are flawed, and perfect shouldn't be the enemy of good as often as it seems to be.