This implies that the writer thinks he has found accurate stats on attempted suicide and completed suicide for GIDS in this time frame, but of course he does not have accurate stats. He has the stats on what has been reported to him, and these are the figures that GIDS have recorded - that have been reported to them (by who - the parents, the children themseves?)
I also believe he has discussed this with clinicians directly.
Do you honestly believe that clinicians would not know the number of patients that suddenly don’t come to appointments? If the clinicians themselves are also reporting the numbers are no higher than other very vulnerable teenagers with similar mental health, I would expect there might be something to consider.
Rather than only reading a lobby group’s claims. And just how much of their claim has been based on the incredibly over used self selected and incentivised survey done by the Trevor project that we see posted here so often. With incredibly poor methodology as well and based on USA cultural aspects.
And as has been brought up already. The current research and current feedback from across the world is saying that the current agenda pushed of affirming only is failing these young transitioners.
There is also research that shows that the rates of suicide during or after treatment is of more concern. Because of the lack of focus the current affirming only treatment has on dealing with comorbidities. And with the regrets of surgeries and hormone therapy for various reasons.
I am sure we can find the studies and the papers. They have been stashed on the ‘Break it down’ thread. The one about suicide after treatment was even presented as a ‘gotcha’ by an activist who thought it presented something it did not really say.
So I am concerned by posters claiming that they know better than the clinicians and the organizations who would be collecting the data - coroners included. I mean Tavistock spokespeople also state rates are no higher than comparative groups.
If posters are really arguing these figures, and organisations are incorrect, I look forward to actual original sourced studies and peer reviewed papers that back up this.