Now to reiterate and conclude this post thread,
First Horowitz defends Rollings right to say whatever she likes against trans-ideology, then he goes on to talk about also being afraid to write women “offensively” lest he should fall on the wrong side of cancel culture for this different reason.
Then I question (based on observation) whether those defending Rowlings right to free speech on this issue would also extend the same “privilege” to Horowitz should he say something which offended or was against their own feminist ideology. I was assured that this would be the case despite the reality that this isn’t true in the main in the real world.
This then turned to discussion on comments being deleted easily here which was both agreed and disagreed with - but of course only the people making “good” comments were being deleted and nobody else. This “only feminist comments are deleted” viewpoint was agreed upon by feminists here, a position which was called (by me) evidence of an echo chamber which was heartily denied by said feminists - who then congratulated each other on their own denial of being part of an echo chamber, taking it somehow as proof that they were not.
Somebody also asked me to remember some post they made - it wasn’t clear which they were talking about and they got mad when I asked them to clarify.
The basic immutable point of all this being that those who defend Rowling’s free speech against trans ideology can also be observed trying to shut down free speech for others by either calling it “hate” or “prejudice” (examples of this phrase being used are present in these posts).
Anyway, this is going round in echo chamber like circles reminiscent of an echo chamber - even though this may or may not be an echo chamber and my dinners ready so we’ll conclude this thread here.