@ScreamingMeMe
Your evidence of this
Based on observance it seems the people defending Rowling against “cancelling” for ideological reasons (the feminists not the daily mail crowd) were also once (and still?) very quick to want the same censorship of others whose views didn’t align with theirs.
Exactly this. Evidence please.
Odd that despite the fact that I highlighted a specific claim, Plopper chose to ignore what I said and attempted distraction.
As someone else said, Schrödinger's Ploppy: simultaneously someone who doesn’t follow this board, yet somehow knows everything about what is said here.
For what it’s worth, I’ve never seen any of the regular women here calling for any author to be cancelled, and I am here a lot. There are sometimes frustrations expressed and statements that women will avoid certain products or businesses, but I’ve not seen any evidence suggesting anyone should be cancelled, their books banned or removed from shops or libraries, they should be “educated” or lose their job, or that their publisher should remove them which is a very different thing. I suspect my knowledge of what is actually said here is much clearer than someone who appears to have arrived with extreme inbuilt prejudice about feminists, who is now applying it randomly to a different group of women.
And please don’t @ me Ploppy. I commented directly to you. I don’t need an e-mail to tell me you’re likely to reply.