[quote Brainwave89]@greenmarlin Sorry but that makes no sense. If a woman wishes to have a female midwife she can have one. To go on to conclude that having men as midwives is a danger to women does not have a basis in logic and appears to be simple prejudice. I speak as a woman who has to operate in a largely male environment and where for many years men would argue about how women lacked the skills and natural acumen for the job- using any case where a woman failed to highlight this as a classic example. We cannot have it both ways.[/quote]
No, there are women on this thread who have been told they have to have a male midwife.
And as has been said repeatedly on this and other threads, women are socialised to be nice and to not say I don't want a male midwife. Some have accepted a male midwife and are still troubled by the experience.
The point is that you don't know which ones are abusers. Often it's not the ones you think, or you are made to feel you misunderstood. Abusers are very very skilful at hiding in plain sight.
And of course it's not prejudice, it's a fact - as can be seen in the news story and court case that sparked this thread. I know, I know, not all men, but too many of them, sadly, to pretend that males looking after vulnerable women is not going to have devastating consequences for some women, and that is too many. How is that not logic? He was found guilty FGS.
And yes, I know, female midwives can also be struck off. We're not talking about them.
And your anecdote about the sexist men you worked with only proves that you worked with sexist men. It's got nothing to do with this story.