What a massive cock up, and I'm sure it's completely unnecessary.
Its going to be difficult. I'm sure some ppl will now not want to be associated with her, as we know how things work in these close knit fields where it is very important to be seen as 'progressive'. Hopefully she has built up enough contacts, respect, & cache over the years to have a network ready to go. But those who work visibly with her will get nastiness from some quarters. Some people will want to give the dancers who signed the letter a wide birth (silently), but others will want to be seen to rally to them.
I'm still wondering about the 3 who didn't sign.
There is such a discrepancy between the two versions of events though. The letter reads like how it always goes (woman says "because of the risks posed by male ppl, and the number of women who've experienced sexual assault, it's important to have some spaces which are genuinely female only", and it's answered with "Omg you are saying all trans women are rapists".) The allegations read like the "OMG" one dimensional responses that we always see. But with serious allegations set out for everyone to read, it will be very difficult for her. I hope there's some way she can counter that. I ding know if the emoluments tribunal will be able to decipher who really said what.
I don't know what a tribunal would say about how the board acted, and whether it was constructive dismissal. They had to investigate, but they seem to have investigated twice because the dancers didn't like the first answer. It sounds unreasonable to me when she had already apologised.
They say they didn't intend her to lose her job. But when you complain to someone's boss you are waving the ultimate sanction in their face. The only reason an employer has more chance if changing someone's behaviour than anyone else is because the person's job depends on it.
They didn't want her to leave. They wanted her to either start seeing the world the way they see it, or to start pretending that she does. Scary enbies.