Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Raquel Rosario Sanchez

207 replies

Signalbox · 25/11/2021 10:13

I have tried to find a previous thread for Raquel but don't seem to be able to locate it.

Raquel has released an update on her crowd justice page.

Hearing to take place from February 7th to February 14th, 2022...

"Dear everyone,
Hope you are well.
We had a very successful hearing on November 17th. It went on for longer than expected (we ended being with the judge for nearly 3 hours) which felt draining and nerve-wrecking for me but it all generated a positive outcome for us.
Our trial will take place from February 7th to February 14th, 2022. My lawyers reached out to the University countless times so we could collaborate and find dates suitable for all the witnesses, lawyers and parties but they refused to even acknowledge our emails. Having to constantly chase them represented an unnecessary expense for us and, I believe one of the purposes was that, without their dates, my case would be thrown way into the future (the other purpose would be to increase our costs). For example, into September or November 2022. I had truly resigned myself to this eventuality so I was surprised that last week the Court decided the dates for us and a lot sooner than I anticipated.
Most of the University's submission on November 17th related to anonymity and secrecy. They sought orders from the Court to further anonymise their disclosure (which the still haven't provided) and they wanted the judge to order that nobody can access legal documents without making an application to the Court. The judge refused both requests citing the principle of open justice, and reminded the University that the Supreme Court ruled that the public has a right to see justice so no requirement to seal the documents would be made for my case.
You have to wonder why is the University so absolutely paranoid about disclosure and why they are so anxious about the eventuality that the public will get to read Court documents about my case (ie. about the University of Bristol's treatment of me). What is it that they are hiding?
Having caused endless obstructions and delays by not releasing their disclosure, the University told the judge that it would take them too long to do it so they wanted the trial dates (established right at the beginning of the hearing) moved. The judge said, and this was beautiful: "I am not moving the trial dates. There have been enormous delays. Those instructing you must get their act together and get ready for the trial." And then she dropped the mic and left. Just kidding, but you can imagine how happy I felt to finally hear that!
We had to make three separate applications to the Court relating to disclosure problems that we have encountered with the University, and they had one application over something that was resolved prior to Nov 17th. While the Court did not grant us the Unless Order we were seeking, the judge did make a comprehensive order that included our concerns. I am particularly happy that the judge considered that all our applications have been reasonable and were due to the drawn out disclosure issues. Therefore, we were awarded cost for all three of our applications. Meanwhile, the Court did not awarded the the Defendant cost for theirs and told the University to go pay for their own application.
I feel very happy that during our November 17th hearing we finally managed to get the dates for our trial, which has been worrying me for such a long time, and I am also happy that the judge said this case was "an extremely important case."
That being said, February 7th, 2022 is almost here. Less than two months and a half away. That means there is a lot of work to be done (as in, A LOT) in a very short amount of time. The University has been increasing our cost unnecessarily and, while we may recover that after the trial, at the moment we really need to raise enough funds to see this case through. Please, if you can share with your friends, families and colleagues, and spread the word on social media, I would really appreciate it.
As always, I am so grateful to my lawyers for their hard work. Particularly to my barrister, Alice de Coverley, who was on fire on Nov 17th. It has been a challenging couple of months with no end in sight but now everything feels clearer and near. Having a trial so soon feels daunting but I am ready.
Thank you all for your kindness and support throughout.
Best,
Raquel
Ps. I was featured on Woman's Hour on my birthday, where I discussed our case. You can listen to the BBC Radio 4 Woman's Hour interview with journalist Emma Barnett (35-06 to 51-41) on the BBC website. An acquaintance volunteered a full transcript of the segment so you can also read the interview on this PDF"

OP posts:
DontAskIDontKnow · 01/02/2022 11:16

Thanks for the reminder.

Femisaurus · 01/02/2022 17:54

Bumpety bump

littlbrowndog · 01/02/2022 19:37

Bump

Time2Move · 01/02/2022 19:49

Done. Thanks for the prompt.

Alekto · 01/02/2022 20:37

Bump! Thanks

highame · 02/02/2022 15:40

Worth a bump with lots of people looking

334bu · 03/02/2022 16:45

Bump

334bu · 04/02/2022 16:58

Just over 4000 carrots to go.🥕

jhuizinga · 04/02/2022 17:14

There's a good article in today's Telegraph about Raquel and her case (mentions the other one as well). Unfortunately, it's behind a pay wall but might have been archived.

www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/student-forced-standing-women/

Alekto · 04/02/2022 20:32

Archived here archive.fo/MQB8V

Alekto · 04/02/2022 20:49

"Rosario Sanchez is at pains to stress that she is not transphobic. “I’m so careful with the words I choose, but it doesn’t matter how careful you are, the problem is that you are a woman who dissents. Women having these conversations is beyond the pale."

This is regularly demonstrated by the MRAs who spend their time on here, policing our language and telling us what we should be thinking, and also by the MRAs who spend their time monitoring us from twitter and mass reporting MN to its advertisers or targeting prominent posters for reporting to MNHQ. They really cannot bear women who dissent.

So

BUMP

Alekto · 04/02/2022 20:51

Raquel's doing an AMA:

#RaquelvBristolUni: Ask Me Anything www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/4471745--RaquelvBristolUni-Ask-Me-Anything

Rightsraptor · 05/02/2022 16:12

I've just been digging in Raquel's vegetable patch but she needs more carrots 🥕 if you can spare some. The garden needs to be finished by tomorrow, so hurry!

334bu · 05/02/2022 17:21

Not far to go but only a day to do it.

TofuDelights · 06/02/2022 19:14

Bump

Signalbox · 07/02/2022 10:37

Fingers crossed for some live tweeting but not seen anything yet.

OP posts:
yourhairiswinterfire · 07/02/2022 10:44

Tribunal Tweets said last night that they hope to be live tweeting on Tuesday.

twitter.com/tribunaltweets/status/1490440222286532608?cxt=HHwWgMC-hYnfja8pAAAA

Signalbox · 07/02/2022 10:50

[quote yourhairiswinterfire]Tribunal Tweets said last night that they hope to be live tweeting on Tuesday.

twitter.com/tribunaltweets/status/1490440222286532608?cxt=HHwWgMC-hYnfja8pAAAA[/quote]
Thanks.

OP posts:
NonnyMouse1337 · 07/02/2022 11:17

All the very best to Raquel. Flowers

Justme56 · 07/02/2022 11:38

Good luck Raquel. Nice to see the veggie patch is full. Flowers

HellonHeels · 07/02/2022 12:09

Just did some gardening. The allotment is still open if anyone else wants to contribute.

Discofish · 07/02/2022 14:37

Good luck to Raquel, have donated a couple of times

vivariumvivariumsvivaria · 07/02/2022 15:11

Bumping again, she's nearly at her target.

This is an important case and she has been very brave.

Best of luck today, Raquel.

McDuffy · 07/02/2022 20:40

Just had an email update. Will be watching with interest!

Redshoeblueshoe · 07/02/2022 20:53

Good luck Raquel

Swipe left for the next trending thread