Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Raquel Rosario Sanchez

207 replies

Signalbox · 25/11/2021 10:13

I have tried to find a previous thread for Raquel but don't seem to be able to locate it.

Raquel has released an update on her crowd justice page.

Hearing to take place from February 7th to February 14th, 2022...

"Dear everyone,
Hope you are well.
We had a very successful hearing on November 17th. It went on for longer than expected (we ended being with the judge for nearly 3 hours) which felt draining and nerve-wrecking for me but it all generated a positive outcome for us.
Our trial will take place from February 7th to February 14th, 2022. My lawyers reached out to the University countless times so we could collaborate and find dates suitable for all the witnesses, lawyers and parties but they refused to even acknowledge our emails. Having to constantly chase them represented an unnecessary expense for us and, I believe one of the purposes was that, without their dates, my case would be thrown way into the future (the other purpose would be to increase our costs). For example, into September or November 2022. I had truly resigned myself to this eventuality so I was surprised that last week the Court decided the dates for us and a lot sooner than I anticipated.
Most of the University's submission on November 17th related to anonymity and secrecy. They sought orders from the Court to further anonymise their disclosure (which the still haven't provided) and they wanted the judge to order that nobody can access legal documents without making an application to the Court. The judge refused both requests citing the principle of open justice, and reminded the University that the Supreme Court ruled that the public has a right to see justice so no requirement to seal the documents would be made for my case.
You have to wonder why is the University so absolutely paranoid about disclosure and why they are so anxious about the eventuality that the public will get to read Court documents about my case (ie. about the University of Bristol's treatment of me). What is it that they are hiding?
Having caused endless obstructions and delays by not releasing their disclosure, the University told the judge that it would take them too long to do it so they wanted the trial dates (established right at the beginning of the hearing) moved. The judge said, and this was beautiful: "I am not moving the trial dates. There have been enormous delays. Those instructing you must get their act together and get ready for the trial." And then she dropped the mic and left. Just kidding, but you can imagine how happy I felt to finally hear that!
We had to make three separate applications to the Court relating to disclosure problems that we have encountered with the University, and they had one application over something that was resolved prior to Nov 17th. While the Court did not grant us the Unless Order we were seeking, the judge did make a comprehensive order that included our concerns. I am particularly happy that the judge considered that all our applications have been reasonable and were due to the drawn out disclosure issues. Therefore, we were awarded cost for all three of our applications. Meanwhile, the Court did not awarded the the Defendant cost for theirs and told the University to go pay for their own application.
I feel very happy that during our November 17th hearing we finally managed to get the dates for our trial, which has been worrying me for such a long time, and I am also happy that the judge said this case was "an extremely important case."
That being said, February 7th, 2022 is almost here. Less than two months and a half away. That means there is a lot of work to be done (as in, A LOT) in a very short amount of time. The University has been increasing our cost unnecessarily and, while we may recover that after the trial, at the moment we really need to raise enough funds to see this case through. Please, if you can share with your friends, families and colleagues, and spread the word on social media, I would really appreciate it.
As always, I am so grateful to my lawyers for their hard work. Particularly to my barrister, Alice de Coverley, who was on fire on Nov 17th. It has been a challenging couple of months with no end in sight but now everything feels clearer and near. Having a trial so soon feels daunting but I am ready.
Thank you all for your kindness and support throughout.
Best,
Raquel
Ps. I was featured on Woman's Hour on my birthday, where I discussed our case. You can listen to the BBC Radio 4 Woman's Hour interview with journalist Emma Barnett (35-06 to 51-41) on the BBC website. An acquaintance volunteered a full transcript of the segment so you can also read the interview on this PDF"

OP posts:
CompleteGinasaur · 14/01/2022 12:27

Dug again. And bumped.. God, I love Mumsnet - that donation total is going up like a pinball counter, it's very gratifying..

LilithOfEden · 14/01/2022 12:29

Dumping discovery is a low tactic used by a party with something to hide. I've dug a bit for RRS, but not for Crowd Justice, who I still think are utter wankers for their treatment of Allison Bailey.

BoogieFeet · 14/01/2022 12:34

Off to find my trowel..

Feministwoman · 14/01/2022 12:35

I dug yesterday, as soon as I received the update.

ANewCreation · 14/01/2022 12:56

@Stealhsquirrelnutkin

The way Bristol University has mishandled the criminal bullying and intimidation of Raquel is very upsetting.

I think it is made much worse by their obvious attempts to drag out the process. Anyone else wondering if the documents they are so afraid of sharing will mention stalling until her permission to remain in the UK expires?

I hope all the rich foreign parents considering entrusting their children to the care of Bristol University see what has been done to Raquel and decide to choose different universities, ones who take their duty of care towards all students a lot more seriously.

All of this.

I'm another with a daughter who decided not to apply to Bristol purely on the basis of how badly RRS has been treated.

Donated again.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 14/01/2022 13:45

I've met Raquel before at an event, she is lovely and IMO has been treated appallingly. Donating again and I'm sure a huge number of people are rooting for her.

DinosaurOnlySpaces · 14/01/2022 13:49

I've donated again. Just reading her case summary makes me feel furious.

When she told the university she was being bullied, the first response she got was from their press office. At a university which is urgently trying to improve support for student mental health.

Shocking.

ChristinaXYZ · 14/01/2022 15:09

I hope she is able to raise the funds.

Incidentally Ovarit has an activism page where you can post links to allotments no problem. You can go on Ovarit to read that page even if you are not a member. It is useful to bookmark.

CriticalCondition · 14/01/2022 15:35

Donated again.

A massive discovery dump is a shoddy move. But there will be gems in there. All power to Rachel's legal team in finding them.

BernardBlackMissesLangCleg · 14/01/2022 15:46

donated again

it sounds like Bristol are shitting themselves

malloo · 14/01/2022 16:35

Donated. I have so much admiration for Raquel, such a strong, intelligent and articulate woman.

TofuDelights · 14/01/2022 16:43

Thank you for the reminder, I've dug again also.

ThePennyJustDropped · 14/01/2022 17:02

I'm new to all of this. Been lurking a while. The Ulrike stuff around Christmas crystallised my position and since then I've really woken up to what my DM has been saying for years about the erosion of women's rights.

The first I've heard of RRS is today but I've read her page and am horrified so I've dug for her - is that right? I've no idea of the terminology here but to the women of this board thank you for helping me see these issues for what they are. And to my DM if you're here (highly likely!), you've always been a legend and I wish I'd actively got involved in this and added my support much sooner.

peonyred · 14/01/2022 17:04

I've donated and tried to delete the thread I started today to keep comments to this, better established thread.

ArabellaScott · 14/01/2022 17:54

bump. Donated.

morningtoncrescent62 · 14/01/2022 18:07

Shocking and shameful from the management at Bristol University. I have no tools in the shed at the moment but I've set a gardening reminder for when the new stock arrives at the end of the month. Poor Raquel, what this must be like to live through I can't imagine.

Iwishihadariver · 14/01/2022 18:07

Sorry, meant Raquel. And a bump as well.

unwashedanddazed · 14/01/2022 18:18

I've dug again. I feel absolute rage towards Bristol university for the way they've treated Raquel. Particularly because she's in a foreign country and away from her support systems. I love how many women have stepped up to help take care of her.

Pawprintpaper · 14/01/2022 18:44

Cancelled my alumni donations to Bristol and told them exactly why when the asked… tumbleweeds from them after that.

unwashedanddazed · 14/01/2022 21:34

Bump

howard97A · 15/01/2022 02:21

I hope it’s in order for me to post a reminder that there are two closely-related legal actions in progress. There is Raquel’s action against Bristol University, scheduled for trial 07-14 February. And there is there is the action by the feminist students’ society ‘Women Talk Back’ against the Bristol Students’ Union.

WTB were sanctioned by the SU because they wanted to hold women-only meetings.

“The Student Union demanded:

Mandatory “diversity and inclusion” training for our members regarding accepting males into our single-sex female space;
Our President, Raquel Rosario Sánchez, must step down from her role and cannot run as a committee member on any other society’s committee for two years;

Our group is not allowed to be female-only and we must make it clear on our social media pages and our page on the SU website that our group is ‘open to everyone’.”

WTB has a separate allotment.

SeaRabbit · 15/01/2022 07:37

I've popped some more carrots in her trolley. I think. There may have been a problem with the digger, so I've diarised checking. Don't trust Crowd Justice any more, so don't donate even a carrot top to them.

Blessex · 15/01/2022 10:32

Have dug some more

BernardBlackMissesLangCleg · 15/01/2022 10:56

she's had around 400 further pledges since I dug yesterday. how lovely to see women standing behind her

CuriousaboutSamphire · 15/01/2022 11:03

I too am an ex alumni. I cancelled my support, told them why. I got a phone call about 2 months later and I told that person why they were not going to get any more money from me. The lovely response I got was "For fucks sake!" I wrote and complained about that too. Nothing!

If it wasn't for the fact that my mentor is absolutely GC I'd probably have sent back my post grad certificates by now.

I have dug again. Given another year's worth that Bristol would have had.

I am really looking forward to seeing what it is they have been trying to protect. Bastards!!

Swipe left for the next trending thread