Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Raquel Rosario Sanchez

207 replies

Signalbox · 25/11/2021 10:13

I have tried to find a previous thread for Raquel but don't seem to be able to locate it.

Raquel has released an update on her crowd justice page.

Hearing to take place from February 7th to February 14th, 2022...

"Dear everyone,
Hope you are well.
We had a very successful hearing on November 17th. It went on for longer than expected (we ended being with the judge for nearly 3 hours) which felt draining and nerve-wrecking for me but it all generated a positive outcome for us.
Our trial will take place from February 7th to February 14th, 2022. My lawyers reached out to the University countless times so we could collaborate and find dates suitable for all the witnesses, lawyers and parties but they refused to even acknowledge our emails. Having to constantly chase them represented an unnecessary expense for us and, I believe one of the purposes was that, without their dates, my case would be thrown way into the future (the other purpose would be to increase our costs). For example, into September or November 2022. I had truly resigned myself to this eventuality so I was surprised that last week the Court decided the dates for us and a lot sooner than I anticipated.
Most of the University's submission on November 17th related to anonymity and secrecy. They sought orders from the Court to further anonymise their disclosure (which the still haven't provided) and they wanted the judge to order that nobody can access legal documents without making an application to the Court. The judge refused both requests citing the principle of open justice, and reminded the University that the Supreme Court ruled that the public has a right to see justice so no requirement to seal the documents would be made for my case.
You have to wonder why is the University so absolutely paranoid about disclosure and why they are so anxious about the eventuality that the public will get to read Court documents about my case (ie. about the University of Bristol's treatment of me). What is it that they are hiding?
Having caused endless obstructions and delays by not releasing their disclosure, the University told the judge that it would take them too long to do it so they wanted the trial dates (established right at the beginning of the hearing) moved. The judge said, and this was beautiful: "I am not moving the trial dates. There have been enormous delays. Those instructing you must get their act together and get ready for the trial." And then she dropped the mic and left. Just kidding, but you can imagine how happy I felt to finally hear that!
We had to make three separate applications to the Court relating to disclosure problems that we have encountered with the University, and they had one application over something that was resolved prior to Nov 17th. While the Court did not grant us the Unless Order we were seeking, the judge did make a comprehensive order that included our concerns. I am particularly happy that the judge considered that all our applications have been reasonable and were due to the drawn out disclosure issues. Therefore, we were awarded cost for all three of our applications. Meanwhile, the Court did not awarded the the Defendant cost for theirs and told the University to go pay for their own application.
I feel very happy that during our November 17th hearing we finally managed to get the dates for our trial, which has been worrying me for such a long time, and I am also happy that the judge said this case was "an extremely important case."
That being said, February 7th, 2022 is almost here. Less than two months and a half away. That means there is a lot of work to be done (as in, A LOT) in a very short amount of time. The University has been increasing our cost unnecessarily and, while we may recover that after the trial, at the moment we really need to raise enough funds to see this case through. Please, if you can share with your friends, families and colleagues, and spread the word on social media, I would really appreciate it.
As always, I am so grateful to my lawyers for their hard work. Particularly to my barrister, Alice de Coverley, who was on fire on Nov 17th. It has been a challenging couple of months with no end in sight but now everything feels clearer and near. Having a trial so soon feels daunting but I am ready.
Thank you all for your kindness and support throughout.
Best,
Raquel
Ps. I was featured on Woman's Hour on my birthday, where I discussed our case. You can listen to the BBC Radio 4 Woman's Hour interview with journalist Emma Barnett (35-06 to 51-41) on the BBC website. An acquaintance volunteered a full transcript of the segment so you can also read the interview on this PDF"

OP posts:
JoodyBlue · 14/01/2022 08:50

Thank you. Will donate later today. The behaviour of the university and its lawyers is terrible.

Signalbox · 14/01/2022 09:00

Can't wait. Sounds like there is some compelling evidence.

OP posts:
Iwishihadariver · 14/01/2022 09:04

Just passed on some carrots to Rosario. Not many but this is a great way for lurkers like me to make a small but very satisfying contribution to the GC cause. Make yourself feel epic by doing some gardening! 🥕🥕👩‍🌾

NotAGirl · 14/01/2022 09:09

Topped up my donation

Leafstamp · 14/01/2022 09:10

There seem to be two crowdfunder pages, is this because of a change of law firms? And presumably therefore we need to make sure of donating to the correct one?

bishophaha · 14/01/2022 09:12

Injustice makes me mad but people deliberately avoiding work emails and playing the admin system possibly makes me even madder.
I am going to donate.

Datun · 14/01/2022 09:27

I'm digging this afternoon.

Also hoping Bristol lose and have to pay through the nose. Our national education institutions treating women like shit and being sued for it will attract government attention and public condemnation. They need to stop.

thinkingaboutLangCleg · 14/01/2022 09:42

I’ve dug for Raquel again. I’m so disgusted with Bristol university. They’re going to come out of this with their reputation in shreds, and they deserve all the trouble they’ll be in.

BettyFilous · 14/01/2022 09:44

Is the current, active appeal the one with 23 days left to run and Doyle Clayton as the lawyers acting for her?

ScreamingMeMe · 14/01/2022 09:50

The University's behaviour has been truly shocking in this case. I hope they get severely reprimanded for it. Bastards.

DisappearingGirl · 14/01/2022 09:50

Is the current, active appeal the one with 23 days left to run and Doyle Clayton as the lawyers acting for her?

Yes I'm pretty sure it is. Her recent email update links to the above page!

Datun · 14/01/2022 09:52

@BettyFilous

Is the current, active appeal the one with 23 days left to run and Doyle Clayton as the lawyers acting for her?
Currently 23 days to go and the update on the page is dated jan 13.
YouSetTheTone · 14/01/2022 09:53

Donating again. Misogynist bastards. Kudos to Raquel for all her strength during this.

Rheia1983 · 14/01/2022 09:54

Donating again as well.

DialSquare · 14/01/2022 09:57

I received the update too so will be donating again later. So sorry you've had such a stressful time with this Raquel (if you are reading). There are so many of us rooting for you.

Needmoresleep · 14/01/2022 10:12

Hints that Bristol’s disclosure contains some interesting stuff. We will have to wait till it all comes out in court.

So much is about sunlight.

Very strange things seem to have happened behind closed doors, not just in Universities but in the public and corporate sectors. Thank you Raquel, Maya, Keira, Harry and others for having the perseverance and courage to force exposure. We owe you.

Lordamighty · 14/01/2022 10:22

10,000 pages of disclosure dumped on her by Bristol University. It will be interesting to see what they are hiding in that haystack.
More digging done ✅

SirSamuelVimes · 14/01/2022 10:34

I have done a little dig. It's not much but would rather do something than nothing.

Hoardasurass · 14/01/2022 10:46

Is the trial being hurd now or was January a typo ie was the hearing 6-14th January or February?

Needmoresleep · 14/01/2022 10:48

I think they have just had a sort of pre hearing to check that both sides are ready for court in February.

Datun · 14/01/2022 11:06

I wonder if it's all about where they received their advice, and whether it's Stonewall.

Mumsnut · 14/01/2022 11:12

Have used my trowel. I imagine she has a tribe of determined women volunteers winnowing the disclosure with her and her lawyers. I hope so, anyway.

Huckleberries73 · 14/01/2022 11:14

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

yourhairiswinterfire · 14/01/2022 11:20

@Hoardasurass

Is the trial being hurd now or was January a typo ie was the hearing 6-14th January or February?
Yes, it's a typo in one of the paragraphs that suggests the trial has already happened, but the header gives the correct date, 7th-14th Feb.

Bristol have acted disgracefully. Hope it goes against them. Good luck Raquel!

JoyousAsOtters · 14/01/2022 12:07

Thanks for the reminder. More power to you RRS.

Swipe left for the next trending thread