Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Raquel Rosario Sanchez

207 replies

Signalbox · 25/11/2021 10:13

I have tried to find a previous thread for Raquel but don't seem to be able to locate it.

Raquel has released an update on her crowd justice page.

Hearing to take place from February 7th to February 14th, 2022...

"Dear everyone,
Hope you are well.
We had a very successful hearing on November 17th. It went on for longer than expected (we ended being with the judge for nearly 3 hours) which felt draining and nerve-wrecking for me but it all generated a positive outcome for us.
Our trial will take place from February 7th to February 14th, 2022. My lawyers reached out to the University countless times so we could collaborate and find dates suitable for all the witnesses, lawyers and parties but they refused to even acknowledge our emails. Having to constantly chase them represented an unnecessary expense for us and, I believe one of the purposes was that, without their dates, my case would be thrown way into the future (the other purpose would be to increase our costs). For example, into September or November 2022. I had truly resigned myself to this eventuality so I was surprised that last week the Court decided the dates for us and a lot sooner than I anticipated.
Most of the University's submission on November 17th related to anonymity and secrecy. They sought orders from the Court to further anonymise their disclosure (which the still haven't provided) and they wanted the judge to order that nobody can access legal documents without making an application to the Court. The judge refused both requests citing the principle of open justice, and reminded the University that the Supreme Court ruled that the public has a right to see justice so no requirement to seal the documents would be made for my case.
You have to wonder why is the University so absolutely paranoid about disclosure and why they are so anxious about the eventuality that the public will get to read Court documents about my case (ie. about the University of Bristol's treatment of me). What is it that they are hiding?
Having caused endless obstructions and delays by not releasing their disclosure, the University told the judge that it would take them too long to do it so they wanted the trial dates (established right at the beginning of the hearing) moved. The judge said, and this was beautiful: "I am not moving the trial dates. There have been enormous delays. Those instructing you must get their act together and get ready for the trial." And then she dropped the mic and left. Just kidding, but you can imagine how happy I felt to finally hear that!
We had to make three separate applications to the Court relating to disclosure problems that we have encountered with the University, and they had one application over something that was resolved prior to Nov 17th. While the Court did not grant us the Unless Order we were seeking, the judge did make a comprehensive order that included our concerns. I am particularly happy that the judge considered that all our applications have been reasonable and were due to the drawn out disclosure issues. Therefore, we were awarded cost for all three of our applications. Meanwhile, the Court did not awarded the the Defendant cost for theirs and told the University to go pay for their own application.
I feel very happy that during our November 17th hearing we finally managed to get the dates for our trial, which has been worrying me for such a long time, and I am also happy that the judge said this case was "an extremely important case."
That being said, February 7th, 2022 is almost here. Less than two months and a half away. That means there is a lot of work to be done (as in, A LOT) in a very short amount of time. The University has been increasing our cost unnecessarily and, while we may recover that after the trial, at the moment we really need to raise enough funds to see this case through. Please, if you can share with your friends, families and colleagues, and spread the word on social media, I would really appreciate it.
As always, I am so grateful to my lawyers for their hard work. Particularly to my barrister, Alice de Coverley, who was on fire on Nov 17th. It has been a challenging couple of months with no end in sight but now everything feels clearer and near. Having a trial so soon feels daunting but I am ready.
Thank you all for your kindness and support throughout.
Best,
Raquel
Ps. I was featured on Woman's Hour on my birthday, where I discussed our case. You can listen to the BBC Radio 4 Woman's Hour interview with journalist Emma Barnett (35-06 to 51-41) on the BBC website. An acquaintance volunteered a full transcript of the segment so you can also read the interview on this PDF"

OP posts:
Waitwhat23 · 15/01/2022 11:17

@curiousaboutsamphire Hang on, I must have read that wrong. Someone from Bristol University (alumni association?) phoned you to ask you why you had stopped your donation and said 'for fuck's sake!' when you explained why? Seriously?

Abunchofyellowroses · 15/01/2022 11:20

Thank you for the post, OP.

I’m doing dry January. It’s bloody horrible! However, all the money I have saved has become carrots 🥕 to support this brave woman.
Courage!

Bristol University is a disgrace.

CuriousaboutSamphire · 15/01/2022 11:22

[quote Waitwhat23]@curiousaboutsamphire Hang on, I must have read that wrong. Someone from Bristol University (alumni association?) phoned you to ask you why you had stopped your donation and said 'for fuck's sake!' when you explained why? Seriously?[/quote]
Yup. You read that correctly. I got his first name and asked them to tell me if such conversations were recorded and, if so, how I could get a copy, if they would review it.

No reply. I chased it up in September and November. Maybe, with the court date coming up, I'll chase it again, with a more legally phrased request.

Waitwhat23 · 15/01/2022 11:40

So swearing at a donor over the phone is apparently perfectly acceptable as long as they are a woman with GC views.

BernardBlackMissesLangCleg · 15/01/2022 11:49

Cor blimey, Bristol are fucked aren’t they?

KittenKong · 15/01/2022 12:08

I’d be writing to HR. Begging for money then abusing you when you say why you can’t do this. Cheeky wee thing.

CuriousaboutSamphire · 15/01/2022 12:10

I have already written, email and snail mail, and called. No reply.

This to thread has stirred me to chase it up again, more stridently.

morningtoncrescent62 · 15/01/2022 12:16

@BernardBlackMissesLangCleg

she's had around 400 further pledges since I dug yesterday. how lovely to see women standing behind her
That's always heartening. And hopefully another slew of carrots when those of us who need to wait till the end of the month can get our spades out.
SirSamuelVimes · 15/01/2022 12:23

I think that the crowdfunder has gone up by about 10k since I donated yesterday. Smile

BettyFilous · 15/01/2022 12:24

@CuriousaboutSamphire

I have already written, email and snail mail, and called. No reply.

This to thread has stirred me to chase it up again, more stridently.

Copy in the vice chancellor. That should get a response, especially if you include the email trail showing there was no response to your previous correspondence.
CuriousaboutSamphire · 15/01/2022 12:32

I shall do that, thanks.

I have to be scrupulously fair, he didn't shout it at me, might even have thought I'd out the phone down. It was said in a frustrated time rather than angrily at me.

Or maybe that's just me being nice!

Either way, I will be popping a letter in the post and duplicating it in an email, again.

Grumpyosaurus · 15/01/2022 12:53

I've just tried to donate and a message came up saying 'This case is not accepting new pledges'.

Does anyone know what's going on?

peonyred · 15/01/2022 13:01

I suspect you might be on the wrong fund raising page, there was an earlier one which is now closed. Try Crowd justice.

MRB2 · 15/01/2022 13:01

I've just added a few seedlings to the pot. There are two gardens; the garden called enabled needs seedlings but the garden called permitted has closed to visitors.

PegasusReturns · 15/01/2022 13:15

@CuriousaboutSamphire frame your request as a Data Subject Access Request. You are asking for a copy of all the information they hold on you including the voice recording of the call that took place and any notes/emails/correspondence that it generated. They have a month to respond with the data requested.

CuriousaboutSamphire · 15/01/2022 13:27

Thanks. That's the term I was looking for. I'll look that up and phrase it carefully.

Grumpyosaurus · 15/01/2022 14:21

@peonyred

I suspect you might be on the wrong fund raising page, there was an earlier one which is now closed. Try Crowd justice.
Cheers - successful gardening now completed.
ShenanigAnne · 15/01/2022 20:37

I'm a post grad student at Bristol, different but close dept to CGVR. I've heard nothing at all about this at Bristol Confused
Does anyone know if those involved are still students here, or was disciplinary action taken against the original TRAs? I've googled but not managed to find out much - none of the names, including Raquel Rosario Sanchez, appear on the department listings online for instance.

ixqik · 16/01/2022 06:46

I've warned one international student away from Sussex Uni (Kathleen Stock) and will add Bristol to that list in the future. @ShenanigAnne I've screen grabs of one of the main instigators at Bristol, IIRC this one is a TIF.

Iwishihadariver · 16/01/2022 08:33

Oh goody, 54,823 carrots now. Lines up popcorn ready.

CuriousaboutSamphire · 16/01/2022 10:35

@ShenanigAnne

I'm a post grad student at Bristol, different but close dept to CGVR. I've heard nothing at all about this at Bristol Confused Does anyone know if those involved are still students here, or was disciplinary action taken against the original TRAs? I've googled but not managed to find out much - none of the names, including Raquel Rosario Sanchez, appear on the department listings online for instance.
There was a sort of gagging order and the names of the complainant/s was kept a secret*, may be one of the 'interesting' things mentioned.

*Secret as in the Unviersity didn;t name names. The person/people themselves were quite vocal for a while but have since deleted themselves.

If you do an Advanced search here for RRS name you will find older threads which contains screenshots and far more detail. Go back into 2019 and 2020

Datun · 16/01/2022 11:35

I'm a bit hazy, but I believe you will be able to find the right threads merely by searching the magic sentence

my pronouns are they you fucking cunt

CuriousaboutSamphire · 16/01/2022 11:39

Grin of course!! How did I not remember that?

ShenanigAnne · 16/01/2022 13:42

@ixqik what is a TIF?

I've followed up on some of the old threads on here - amazing what goes on below the surface, eh? I was just quite surprised that there seems to be no record of 'my pronouns are they you fucking cunt' as having studied or graduated at Bristol. Ditto RRS. I'd understand name suppression as part of legal action but not expect individuals to be entirely erased from departmental profiles. Maybe I'm being naïve.

Horrendous situation though. Happy to add a small handful of Bristol carrots to the RRS garden in solidarity.

CuriousaboutSamphire · 16/01/2022 13:45

We aren't actually allowed to use that term here, it is against this specific part of the site's T+Cs.

We are allowed to use transmen, even if it does cause more confusion.

Swipe left for the next trending thread