@Ereshkigalangcleg
Why should you only be able to have a supportive environment for girls if you pay more than most people can afford? How is this progressive? It's all right Jack, is what it is. It's a problem for state schools, but that's too bad, it's not for us? Excellent.
This is my point.
The reality is that because indie single sex schools can select their intake, they are not going to admit ‘trans’ kids meaning that the changing rooms etc will remain single sex.
The girls’ schools also seem to be selling feminism (whether it is or not) and empowering girls as their USP. The data shows that girls in single sex environments are much more likely to do STEM subjects than in mixed environments because these are seen as boys subjects.
I’m not saying it’s right. It absolutely isn’t.
But I agree with the posters who say that these indie schools are so aware of their privilege that they are trying ham-fistedly to show it.
I also agree that some (not all) indie single sex schools put an absurd amount of pressure on girls. There’s one here which is regularly the no 1 or in the top 10 in the country.
They kick 7 year olds out of their junior school if they are not academic enough and plenty of their students drop out or end up with severe mental health problems because of the pressure.
I also agree with the sentiment that just because this woman is head of a £40k a year school she somehow has superior insight. Private school heads are recruited because of their own class and privilege.
Without giving too much away, I’ve seen a consultant dismiss a candidate for an Indy head job because she came from a state background and needed “to upgrade her wardrobe to meet parental expectations”.
Fortunately she performed best on all the tasks and was appointed.