Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

BBC article about cotton ceiling

999 replies

GingerAndTheBiscuits · 26/10/2021 09:54

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-57853385 including Angela Wild, Rose of Dawn and Debbie Hayton. There’s no way this would have been published even just a few months ago 🤯

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
NecessaryScene · 27/10/2021 10:45

That's just embarrassing parroting, Catherina. There was no poll

Again. Content of article proven. People like Catherina will LIE about the article just to try to discredit the reporting to stop lesbians being listened to.

It is a very strong claim that people will actually refuse to take male-on-lesbian coercion seriously, and try cover it up, but Catherina demonstrates it.

Thank you.

mammajustkilledagnat · 27/10/2021 10:46

It's because even acknowledging it is a problem for ONE person means acknowledging that men CANNOT be women, EVER. And therein lies the rub (for the alphabet soup).

FindTheTruth · 27/10/2021 10:46

Seen on twitter. TWEET:
"I seriously could cry from relief from that article being published. I was interviewed in September 2020 and thought there was no way it would ever be published. It is a huge, huge, huge deal. Much love to other survivors of the cotton ceiling."

I feel for this person and as Charley says it's the first time mainstream news has covered it. Survivors of any crime or abuse need to be believed.

doublemonkey · 27/10/2021 10:47

Is someone complaining that a sample of 80 lesbians voices is insufficient??

Here's a link to research piece called Challenging “Autogynephilia” published on Gires website which demonstrates that 93% women also feel autogynephilia.

Only 51 women filed out the questionaire apparently, but that is enough because the person running the survey was a man and he has a PHD!

Shut up lesbians! You're ruining it for everyone!

www.gires.org.uk/challenging-autogynephilia/

logsonlogsoff · 27/10/2021 10:48

' including being totally upfront about the poll'

Yeah, which INHO is why this BS, scaremongering piece should never have been given the time of day.
Much more suited to Foxnews and Dailyfail style of 'journalism'.

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 27/10/2021 10:49

Right, for everyone who is triggered by the word questionnaire, I've revised the article to remove a mention of it

Revised Article, part 1

Is a lesbian transphobic if she does not want to have sex with trans women? Some lesbians say they are increasingly being pressured and coerced into accepting trans women as partners - then shunned and even threatened for speaking out. Several have spoken to the BBC, along with trans women who are concerned about the issue too.

Warning: Story contains strong language

"I've had someone saying they would rather kill me than Hitler," says 24-year-old Jennie*.

"They said they would strangle me with a belt if they were in a room with me and Hitler. That was so bizarrely violent, just because I won't have sex with trans women."

Jennie is a lesbian woman. She says she is only sexually attracted to women who are biologically female and have vaginas. She therefore only has sex and relationships with women who are biologically female.

Jennie doesn't think this should be controversial, but not everyone agrees. She has been described as transphobic, a genital fetishist, a pervert and a "terf" - a trans exclusionary radical feminist.

"There's a common argument that they try and use that goes 'What if you met a woman in a bar and she's really beautiful and you got on really well and you went home and you discovered that she has a penis? Would you just not be interested?'" says Jennie, who lives in London and works in fashion.

"Yes, because even if someone seems attractive at first you can go off them. I just don't possess the capacity to be sexually attracted to people who are biologically male, regardless of how they identify."

I became aware of this particular issue after I wrote an article aboutsex, lies and legal consent.

Several people got in touch with me to say there was a "huge problem" for lesbians, who were being pressured to "accept the idea that a penis can be a female sex organ".

I knew this would be a hugely divisive subject, but I wanted to find out how widespread the issue was.

Ultimately, it has been difficult to determine the true scale of the problem because there has been little research on this topic - only one survey to my knowledge. However, those affected have told me the pressure comes from a minority of trans women, as well as activists who are not necessarily trans themselves.

They described being harassed and silenced if they tried to discuss the issue openly. I received online abuse myself when I tried to find interviewees using social media.

One of the lesbian women I spoke to, 24-year-old Amy*, told me she experienced verbal abuse from her own girlfriend, a bisexual woman who wanted them to have a threesome with a trans woman.

When Amy explained her reasons for not wanting to, her girlfriend became angry.

"The first thing she called me was transphobic," Amy said. "She immediately jumped to make me feel guilty about not wanting to sleep with someone."

She said the trans woman in question had not undergone genital surgery, so still had a penis.

"I know there is zero possibility for me to be attracted to this person," said Amy, who lives in the south west of England and works in a small print and design studio.

"I can hear their male vocal cords. I can see their male jawline. I know, under their clothes, there is male genitalia. These are physical realities, that, as a woman who likes women, you can't just ignore."

Amy said she would feel this way even if a trans woman had undergone genital surgery - which some opt for, while many don't.

Soon afterwards Amy and her girlfriend split up.

"I remember she was extremely shocked and angry, and claimed my views were extremist propaganda and inciting violence towards the trans community, as well as comparing me to far-right groups," she said.

Another lesbian woman, 26-year-old Chloe*, said she felt so pressured she ended up having penetrative sex with a trans woman at university after repeatedly explaining she was not interested.

They lived near each other in halls of residence. Chloe had been drinking alcohol and does not think she could have given proper consent.

"I felt very bad for hating every moment, because the idea is we are attracted to gender rather than sex, and I did not feel that, and I felt bad for feeling like that," she said.

Ashamed and embarrassed, she decided not to tell anyone.

"The language at the time was very much 'trans women are women, they are always women, lesbians should date them'. And I was like, that's the reason I rejected this person. Does that make me bad? Am I not going to be allowed to be in the LGBT community anymore? Am I going to face repercussions for that instead?' So I didn't actually tell anyone."

Hearing about experiences like these led one lesbian activist to begin researching the topic. Angela C. Wild is co-founder of Get The L Out, whose members believe the rights of lesbians are being ignored by much of the current LGBT movement.

She and her fellow activists have demonstrated at Pride marches in the UK, where they have faced opposition. Pride in London accused the group of "bigotry, ignorance and hate".

"Lesbians are still extremely scared to speak because they think they won't be believed, because the trans ideology is so silencing everywhere," she said.

"I thought I would be called a transphobe or that it would be wrong of me to turn down a trans woman who wanted to exchange nude pictures," one woman wrote. "Young women feel pressured to sleep with trans women 'to prove I am not a terf'."

One woman reported being targeted in an online group. "I was told that homosexuality doesn't exist and I owed it to my trans sisters to unlearn my 'genital confusion' so I can enjoy letting them penetrate me," she wrote.

One compared going on dates with trans women to so-called conversion therapy - the controversial practice of trying to change someone's sexual orientation.

"I knew I wasn't attracted to them but internalised the idea that it was because of my 'transmisogyny' and that if I dated them for long enough I could start to be attracted to them. It was DIY conversion therapy," she wrote.

Another reported a trans woman physically forcing her to have sex after they went on a date.

"[They] threatened to out me as a terf and risk my job if I refused to sleep with [them]," she wrote. "I was too young to argue and had been brainwashed by queer theory so [they were] a 'woman' even if every fibre of my being was screaming throughout so I agreed to go home with [them]. [They] used physical force when I changed my mind upon seeing [their] penis and raped me."

While welcomed by some in the LGBT community, Angela's report was described as transphobic by others.

"[People said] we are worse than rapists because we [supposedly] try to frame every trans woman as a rapist," said Angela.

"This is not the point. The point is that if it happens we need to speak about it. If it happens to one woman it's wrong. As it turns out it happens to more than one woman."

Trans YouTuber Rose of Dawn has discussed the issue on her channelin a video called "Is Not Dating Trans People 'Transphobic'?"

"This is something I've seen happen in real life to friends of mine. This was happening before I actually started my channel and it was one of the things that spurred it on," said Rose.

"What's happening is women who are attracted to biological females and female genitalia are finding themselves put in very awkward positions, where if for example on a dating website a trans woman approaches them and they say 'sorry I'm not into trans women', then they are labelled as transphobic."

Rose made the video in response to a series of tweets bytrans athlete Veronica Ivy, then known as Rachel McKinnon,whowrote about hypothetical scenarioswhere trans people are rejected, and argued that "genital preferences" are transphobic.

I asked Veronica Ivy if she would speak to me but she did not want to.

Rose believes views like this are "incredibly toxic". She believes the idea that dating preferences are transphobic is being pushed by radical trans activists and their "self-proclaimed allies", who have extreme views which don't reflect the views of trans women she knows in real life.

"Certainly from my own friends group, the trans women I'm friends with, almost all of them agree lesbians are free to exclude trans women from their dating pool," she said.

However, she believes even trans people are afraid to talk openly about this for fear of abuse.

"People like me receive quite a lot of abuse from trans activists and their allies," she said.

"The trans activist side is incredibly rabid against people who they see as stepping out of line."

Debbie Hayton, a science teacher who transitioned in 2012 andwrites about trans issues, worries some people transition without realising how hard it will be to form relationships.

Although there is currently little data on the sexual orientation of trans women, she believes most are female-attracted because they are biologically male and most males are attracted to women.

"So when they [trans women] are trying to find partners, when lesbian women say 'we want women', and heterosexual women say they want a heterosexual man, that leaves trans women isolated from relationships, and possibly feeling very let down by society, angry, upset and feeling that the world is out to get them," she said.

Debbie thinks it's fine if a lesbian woman does not want to date a trans woman, but is concerned some are being pressured to do so.

"The way that shaming is used is just horrific; it's emotional manipulation and warfare going on," she said.

"These women who want to form relationships with other biological women are feeling bad about that. How did we get here?"

Stonewall is the largest LGBT organisation in the UK and Europe. I asked the charity about these issues but it was unable to provide anyone for interview. However, in a statement, chief executive Nancy Kelley likened not wanting to date trans people to not wanting to date people of colour, fat people, or disabled people.

She said: "Sexuality is personal and something which is unique to each of us. There is no 'right' way to be a lesbian, and only we can know who we're attracted to.

"Nobody should ever be pressured into dating, or pressured into dating people they aren't attracted to. But if you find that when dating, you are writing off entire groups of people, like people of colour, fat people, disabled people or trans people, then it's worth considering how societal prejudices may have shaped your attractions.

"We know that prejudice is still common in the LGBT+ community, and it's important that we can talk about that openly and honestly."

zafferana · 27/10/2021 10:49

@Bellendejour

Hello all, this has likely already been posted on here but just to bump to the front, here is the link to send positive feedback on the article to the BBC:

www.bbc.co.uk/contact/comments-feedback

And this is the online link to the original article you need to paste in to the form:

www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-57853385.amp

As we know, shameless TRA rape/assault deniers are flooding the BBC with complaints, so please flood them with praise for drawing attention to this issue.

It’s vital for women’s safety that this article remains up and the BBC continue to tell the true stories and experiences of women.

Supportive comment sent to the BBC. Thanks for the links @Bellendejour. Please everyone who supports a light being shone on this issue, do the same.
FindTheTruth · 27/10/2021 10:49

TWEET
Allison Bailey @BluskyeAllison
"So there it is people. Homosexuals are like racists according to Nancy Kelly of Stonewall.

Can someone please tell Nancy that sexual orientation is a protected characteristic under the EqA 2010."

mammajustkilledagnat · 27/10/2021 10:50

Please quote the exact sentences in the article that you feel are

  1. Bullshit
  2. Scaremongering
PurgatoryOfPotholes · 27/10/2021 10:51

@logsonlogsoff

' including being totally upfront about the poll'

Yeah, which INHO is why this BS, scaremongering piece should never have been given the time of day.
Much more suited to Foxnews and Dailyfail style of 'journalism'.

I've removed the mention of the questionnaire. Is it still wrong to report on women being raped?
CatherinaJTV · 27/10/2021 10:51

Divert! Divert! Quick, everyone, look at that thing over there!

my original point yesterday that some more people have brought up is that the article is based on biased and shoddy research. My point today is more evidence of that.

Focus, Catherina. Do you agree that genital preferences are transphobic, as Stonewall do?

I am focussed

GingerAndTheBiscuits · 27/10/2021 10:51

@CatherinaJTV

the BBC response is just blabla - I don't have the time to go through the hundreds of answers here, but has the fact that the lesbian porn actress interviewed has sexually assaulted women been discussed? The many stories surfacing (including one apology from the woman herself) are horrifying.
It’s interesting that we do have to listen to the women who have made allegations against Lily Cade but don’t have to listen to the women reporting their experiences with transwomen. Real headscratcher, that one.
OP posts:
MonsignorMirth · 27/10/2021 10:52

@logsonlogsoff

' including being totally upfront about the poll'

Yeah, which INHO is why this BS, scaremongering piece should never have been given the time of day.
Much more suited to Foxnews and Dailyfail style of 'journalism'.

You think people giving their accounts of rape are "bullshit". Liars.

Got it.

PronounssheRa · 27/10/2021 10:55

Yeah, which INHO is why this BS, scaremongering piece should never have been given the time of day.

Ignore the fairly small section of the article which talks about the qualitative analysis of the experiences of 80 women. Instead focus on the accounts given by the women in the article. Why are you ignoring their experience, why do you want rape and sexual coercion covered up?

The reactions to this piece tell us a lot about the current culture in the LGBT+ community, none of it good

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 27/10/2021 10:56

my original point yesterday that some more people have brought up is that the article is based on biased and shoddy research. My point today is more evidence of that.

Then how come so much of it is left once I removed the reference to the questionnaire you don't like?

BBC article, Part 2

Stonewall was founded in 1989 by people opposed to what was known as Section 28 -legislation which stopped councils and schools from "promoting" homosexuality. The organisation originally focused on issues affecting lesbian, gay and bisexual people, thenin 2015 announced it would campaign for "trans equality".

A new group - LGB Alliance - has been formed partly in response toStonewall's change of focus, by people who believe the interests of LGB people are being left behind.

"It's fair to say that I didn't expect to have to fight for these rights again, the rights of people whose sexual orientation is towards people of the same sex," said co-founder Bev Jackson, who also co-founded the UK Gay Liberation Front in 1970.

"We sort of thought that battle had been won and it's quite frightening and quite horrifying that we have to fight that battle again."

LGB Alliance says it is particularly concerned about younger and therefore more vulnerable lesbians being pressured into relationships with trans women.

"It's very disturbing that you find people saying 'It doesn't happen, nobody pressures anybody to go to bed with anybody else', but we know this is not the case," said Ms Jackson.

"We know a minority, but still a sizeable minority of trans women, do pressure lesbians to go out with them and have sex with them and it's a very disturbing phenomenon."

I asked Ms Jackson how she knew a "sizeable minority" of trans women were doing this.

She said: "We don't have figures but we are frequently contacted by lesbians who relate their experience in LGBT groups and on dating sites."

Why does she think there has been so little research?

"I certainly think research on this topic would be discouraged, presumably because it would be characterised as a deliberately discriminatory project," she said.

"But also, the girls and young women themselves, since it's likely the shyest and least experienced young women who are the victims of such encounters, would be loath to discuss them."

LGB Alliance has been described as a hate group, anti-trans and transphobic. However, Ms Jackson insists the group is none of these things, and includes trans people among its supporters.

"This word transphobia has been placed like a dragon in the path to stop discussion about really important issues," she said.

"It's hurtful to our trans supporters, it's hurtful to all our supporters, to be called a hate group when we're the least hateful people you can find."

The term "cotton ceiling" is sometimes used when discussing these issues, but it is controversial.

It stems from"glass ceiling", which refers to an invisible barrier preventing women from climbing to the top of the career ladder. Cotton is a reference to women's underwear, with the phrase intended to represent the difficulty some trans women feel they face when seeking relationships or sex. "Breaking the cotton ceiling" means being able to have sex with a woman.

The term is first thought to have been used in 2012 by a trans porn actress going by the name of Drew DeVeaux. She no longer works in the industry and I have not been able to contact her. However, I spoke to a former porn performer and director who believes she inspired DeVeaux to use it.

Lily Cade, who worked in the industry for 10 years, went by the label "Porn Valley's Gold Star Lesbian" because she only ever had sex with other women.

Lily was asked to do a scene with DeVeaux in Toronto and initially agreed after looking at photos of her. But she backed out in advance after discovering online that she was a trans woman.

"My sex drive was oriented towards women," said Lily. "I couldn't see past the fact that what I was interacting with was male genitalia altered by surgery and not the reproductive organ of a female ape, and I just couldn't get past that."

Feeling guilty, Lily sent DeVeaux an email in which she apologised for being "the worst girl in the whole history of the world".

"I felt really bad about the way that I felt about this, but I did feel that way. I made the choice to say something about it and to back out," she said.

Lily said she was criticised on Twitter at the time, but only among "very fringe queer porno people". However, the concept of the cotton ceiling came to wider attention when it was used in the title of a workshop by Planned Parenthood Toronto.

The title of the workshop was: "Overcoming the Cotton Ceiling: Breaking Down Sexual Barriers for Queer Trans Women", and the description explained how participants would "work together to identify barriers, strategize ways to overcome them, and build community".

It was led by a trans writer and artist who later went to work for Stonewall (the organisation has asked the BBC not to name her because of safeguarding concerns).

"I thought it was kind of gross," said Lily. "The language is gross because you are evoking the metaphor of the glass ceiling, which is about women being oppressed. So saying that if someone doesn't want to have sex with you that person is oppressing you."

The trans woman who led the workshop declined to speak to the BBC, but Planned Parenthood Toronto stood by its decision to hold the workshop.

In a statement sent to the BBC, executive director Sarah Hobbs said the workshop "was never intended to advocate or promote overcoming any individual woman's objections to sexual activity". Instead, she said the workshop explored "the ways in which ideologies of transphobia and transmisogyny impact sexual desire".

In addition to Veronica Ivy, I contacted several other high profile trans women who have either written or spoken about sex and relationships. None of them wanted to speak to me but my editors and I felt it was important to reflect some of their views in this piece.

In a video which has now been deleted, YouTuber Riley J Dennis argued that dating "preferences" are discriminatory.

She asked: "Would you date a trans person, honestly? Think about it for a second. OK, got your answer? Well if you said no, I'm sorry but that's pretty discriminatory."

She explained: "I think the main concern that people have in regards to dating a trans person is that they won't have the genitals that they expect. Because we associate penises with men and vaginas with women, some people think they could never date a trans man with a vagina or a trans woman with a penis.

"But I think that people are more than their genitals. I think you can feel attraction to someone without knowing what's between their legs. And if you were to say that you're only attracted to people with vaginas or people with penises it really feels like you are reducing people just to their genitals."

Another YouTuber, Danielle Piergallini, made a video titled"The Cotton Ceiling: Transphobia, Sex, and Dating (but not transsexuals)".

She said: "I want to talk about the idea that there are a number of people out there who say they're not attracted to trans people, and I think that that is transphobic because any time you're making a broad generalised statement about a group of people that's typically not coming from a good place."

However, she added: "If there is a trans woman who is pre-op and somebody doesn't want to date them because they don't have the genitals that match their preference, that's obviously understandable."

Novelist and poet Roz Kaveney wrote an article called"Some Thoughts on the Cotton Ceiling"and another called"More Cotton Ceiling".

"What is always going on is an assumption that the person is the current status of their bits, and the history of their bits," she wrote in the first article.

"Which is about as reductive a model of sexual attraction as I can imagine."

While this debate was once seen as a fringe issue, most of the interviewees who spoke to me said it has become prominent in recent years because of social media.

Ani O'Brien, spokeswoman for a New Zealand group called Speak Up For Women, created aTikTok video aimed at younger lesbians.

Ani, who is 30, told the BBC she is concerned for the generation of lesbians who are now in their teens.

"What we are seeing is a regression where once again young lesbians are being told 'How do you know you don't like dick if you haven't tried it?'" she said.

"We get told we should be looking beyond genitals and should accept that someone says they are a woman, and that's not what homosexuality is.

"You don't see as many trans men interested in gay men so they don't get it [the pressure] as much, but you do see a lot of trans women who are interested in women, so we are disproportionately affected by it."

Ani believes these kind of messages are confusing for young lesbians.

"I remember being a teenager in the closet and trying desperately to be straight, and that was hard enough," she said.

"I can't imagine what it would have been like, if I'd finally come to terms with the fact I was gay, to then be faced with the idea that some male bodies are not male so they must be lesbian, and having to contend with that as well."

Ani says she gets contacted on Twitter by young lesbians who do not know how to exit a relationship with a trans woman.

"They tried to do the right thing and they gave them a chance, and realised that they are a lesbian and they didn't want to be with someone with a male body, and the concept of transphobia and bigotry is used as an emotional weapon, that you can't leave because otherwise you're a transphobe," she said.

Like others who have voiced their concerns, Ani has received abuse online.

"I've been incited to kill myself, I've had rape threats," she said. However, she says she is determined to keep speaking out.

"A really important thing for us to do is to be able to talk these things through. Shutting down these conversations and calling them bigotry is really unhelpful, and it shouldn't be beyond our ability to have hard conversations about some of these things."

*The BBC has changed the names of some of those featured in this article to protect their identities.

NecessaryScene · 27/10/2021 10:58

This is certainly streamlining the debate nicely. Not even the slightest attempt to refute the story by demonstrating responsible behaviour or the slightest care towards lesbians.

The story here is about how lesbians are treated, because they're deemed to be in the way of "trans rights". In 2018, Get the L Out was struggling to be heard, because what they were alleging seems so far out, so unbelievable. Could organisations like Stonewall and people like Catherina really be that callous?

But now it's being demonstrated loudly and proudly. Everyone can see what they were talking about now, and why they were blocking that pride march.

MonsignorMirth · 27/10/2021 10:58

Is repeatedly calling rape victims liars, and same-sex attraction bigoted, within the MN talk guidelines, I wonder? I'm not going to report as I want them to stand for the lurkers. I'm just surprised it's within civil discussion to call this report "bullshit".

bordersroaming · 27/10/2021 10:59

I disagree that it's shoddy research

It's purpose , method and result reporting are clearly defined and the method chosen is well suited to the purpose and maturity of the domain

And I say again . This is an article reporting rape. Don't ever forget that

Datun · 27/10/2021 11:02

It wouldn't surprise me if there was already a follow-up article on the back burner, collating responses.

There's a huge push to challenge the cancel culture which uses tactics of minimisation, denial, and discrediting.

The BBC have already laid the ground work by pointing out how none of the major players have the balls to face any questions, much less answer them.

And, of course, the one thing that article does, is raise a zillion questions.

The laughable 'I haven't read it but it's crap' responses on this thread would be a start.

MedusasBadHairDay · 27/10/2021 11:03

Just seen on twitter, a lesbian disclosing she was assaulted by a TW, and one of the replies says that the fact she's a self identified radical feminist shows there's a problem with the survey.

Ffs. Good to see their playing the, "wrong type of victim" card. Any more rape myths they want to shoehorn in?

Datun · 27/10/2021 11:06

@MonsignorMirth

Is repeatedly calling rape victims liars, and same-sex attraction bigoted, within the MN talk guidelines, I wonder? I'm not going to report as I want them to stand for the lurkers. I'm just surprised it's within civil discussion to call this report "bullshit".
I know it's difficult to stomach, but I wouldn't report them, either.

Every single person who has put a story out like this, from the Stella O'Malley documentary, to the Nolan podcast and now this, has said they have never had such violent reactions. They've never had such threats.

The two stories go hand-in-hand. This is what's happening and this how.

Fukuraptor · 27/10/2021 11:06

Those accounts of rape, coercion, threats and social ostracizing... Sad I am so grateful that these women and the journalist had the courage and persistence to tell their experiences.

It's disheartening to see the response, nitpicking over numbers affected rather than feeling the horror of those experiences and saying if they only happened to those women then that was too many.

And you don't have to believe the accounts of lesbian women to read the Stonewall response and be blindsided by them calling same-sex attraction akin to a prejudice that can be changed if you reassess you prejudices.

What that quote has done has made it super clear why Stonewall has received criticism for not representing the interests of homosexuals, lesbians in particular. It is crystal clear.

BeBraverToday · 27/10/2021 11:08

I have just tried to send positive feedback to the BBC 3 times, but the site kept crashing. I will try again later. Tip for others, copy your comments before clicking to submit so that you don't have to keep retyping them!

LonginesPrime · 27/10/2021 11:08

When this does come up in conversations at work, etc, it's really important to note that the definition of sexual orientation in the Equality Act is based on same-sex attraction, not same-gender attraction.

If Stonewall has advised your workplace on this, their policy is likely based on Stonewall’s definition of sexual orientation, and the big question is:

how many people in your workplace have been discriminated against for being homosexual without your employers even realising it?

Gay people have been bullied into denying their own sexuality since Stonewall told them it doesn't exist, and employers are directly discriminating against them and making them feel like shit, and silencing them just for being gay. I know this because it happened to me.

Lovelyricepudding · 27/10/2021 11:08

How many women need to be raped before the BBC are allowed to report it?

Swipe left for the next trending thread