It is the logical terminology though - men who are trans should be called trans men, as they are and remain male. Then I could get on board with TWAW!
This has always been my perspective. I remember how flummoxed and outraged I was when I first realised that the word “woman”, in any noun form, was being used to denote some males. The term “ladyboy”, for all the issues with it (and, more importantly, with the culture it comes from), is at least more honest and closer to reality as the “lady” part is used adjectivally and it’s clear that the salient noun is “boy”, ie correctly denoting the sex of that individual.
Of course the whole point of “trans woman”, or even “transwoman”, is to obscure the fact that biologically male trans people are, in fact, male. It’s not an accident, it’s not just being polite; it’s a completely deliberate, ideologically motivated decision to linguistically divest a male person completely of his maleness and therefore make his “inclusion” into the female estate a natural embracing of a type of “woman”, rather than the male appropriation of womanhood.
It’s a big part of the concerted effort to redefine biologically male trans people out of the oppressor sex class, male, and into the oppressed sex class, female, so that biologically male trans people can be seen as a vulnerable, marginalised subset of women, not of men, and therefore MORE vulnerable and marginalised than actual women.
Which both disguises the fact that they are, actually, of the sex class that has privilege (and male physicality) and creates the fiction that (actually vulnerable, marginalised) biologically female people have privilege relative to them. It completely turns reality on its head, and it’s been one of the principle mechanisms through which genderist ideology has been advanced with such success.
Of course those who have this agenda don’t want biologically male trans people to be known as trans men. It’s much too honest and clear.
And imagine the catastrophic effect on their slogan in chief:
“Trans Men Are Women!” blows the whole thing wide open, really, doesn’t it.
Like so many others on here (everyone on here?) I’m no fan of DC, not in the slightest, but I’m still glad he’s said this, and it’s very, very interesting that women would be suspended or banned from Twitter for saying the same, but he isn’t.
Anyone who doesn’t get how real and visceral misogyny still is in the western world today is just walking around with their eyes closed.