And you evidently know zero about trans widows lives pre transition. Because if you did you wouldn't have written all this to say just how wrong those women are.
They dont act as if the transitioned one is dead, the transitioned one actually is gone. Deadnaming, birth cert reissued in the correct sex, new name, new clothes, new breasts, possibly but not always neo vagina, all of this and more and the wife is just supposed to shrug and say 'ok then' ?
So the transitioner rewrites an entire lifetime and the one not transitioning has to agree and even be happy and remember a new name after decades of a dead name?
What is becoming clear to me is that certain people don't see women marrying someone as a choice they make because the woman wants happiness and she feels that the person she is marrying provides that happiness because she loves the things about them that make her happy. But that a woman just marries in order to be a support human for a man, come what may.
If a woman marries a man and it turns out that that man is not the person she fell in love with, or that the man changes himself so completely that he is unrecognisable to the person that she married then of course the woman is going to feel a sort of bereavement. And she should be allowed to voice that.
This idea that women should carry on loving or supporting someone who is absolutely not the person they fell in love with/married and that she is not allowed to voice how it makes her feel that her husband is now a completely different person, is just more misogyny.
Women are allowed to be happy too.