He uses the word 'competent' alot about men and that being what women want.
Which seems fair, I guess we all want people who are competent in the role they are being asked to take on whether it is bring the money in, feed the kids, fix the roof, change a nappy, support me when I'm ill, or protect me from an intruder.
He seems to be talking about the MN 'cocklodger' phenomenom I think.
I guess the range of things we expect men to be competent in now has broadened, and non of them are exclusive to men, so a distinctive role is not defined as it once was.
There are too many men around though who are just not competent in any/most of those roles, and women are now often in a position of having to take on all those roles themselves.
Often instead of equality we've now got women with more pressure and tasks that fall to them.
There are studies which show clearly that a lot of women say that if they could afford to, they would make the choice to stay at home more with thier children.
NB: NOT studies which say women should, but that they'd want to if it was a choice.
When feminists refuse to discuss that there is a biological basis for different choices and roles, and insist everything should be equal in roles between meneand women, we end up here.
And when a man, such as JP says: men stop being useless, have a family, be responsible and selfless, feminists still complain.
JP doesn't say how everyone should do this. Everyone should be free to have the same opportunity and make choices. He just says women and men make different choices because of thier reproductive roles and biology, and many women want capable men who will step up and support them in creating those families. In the way they decide.
It's not prescriptive. It's more: work it out and step up.