If anything, I feel the laws will be more relaxed in future, because the argument for same sex couples (men) to pursue discrimination claims, against laws that take away their rights to become patents, will be high.
So it's all about the men for you, that makes sense as it fits in with your libfem approach to 'feminism'.
There are no laws that prevent men in same sex couples from becoming parents. Biology prevents them. They can and do become adoptive parents and they can co-parent if they do chose. But you seem to think that women have a role to play to ensure that gay men can be biological parents and that is not only a right but also a duty of women to provide womb rental and babies. You may have overlook the post from SapatSea who reference the gay couple in Scotland who got their surrogacy arrangement paid for by the NHS. There is no discrimination but you do need a woman, or several, to make, grow and birth a baby. In that we can agree.
That’s just batshit though isn’t it. I must say, it strikes me particularly with your posts, there is a complete illogical stretch from one topic that goes completely off topic and tries to tie it with something else entirely.
Of course it's batshit, I was being sarcastic. I was using your own argument to to examine the flaws in your statements.
You say that so-called 'altruistic' surrogacy in families is not anyone else's business. You made no comment based on the example I shared where a friend did it for another friend. I noted that was conveniently ignored. Is that because it's different in families?
So what, by your definition, is permitted to be 'our business'? What else would you have us not discuss?
Safeguarding children and vulnerable adults is everyone's business. This is embedded in law and extends to all local council policy. You should check your own. I make surrogacy in general my business because I clearly have a strong interest. You are free to campaign on what you feel in important.
The problems within other countries as you’ve just spouted off, have nothing to do with whether surrogacy is legal here or not or whether it should be.
We look at other countries to examine our own laws and develop and change them.
The Law Commission met with officials from the Ukraine in their work prior to releasing the public consultation. You might have noted that Ukraine is the bargain basement international surrogacy hub, to rival states in America due to their low cost services and relaxed laws. You might have seen the Kiev Hotel Babies in the news last summer but due to your personal view of attachment theory, you might not mind if newborns don't have a primary carer, whether they be 'professional babysitters' in hotel nurseries or 'baby dens'. You might want to compare the public consultations on surrogacy for Australia and New Zealand to see how similar or different they are.
You could also see the locations of exhibitors Men Having Babies to see where they have been and how effective they have been in Israel.
To be clear I'm not suggesting that there is a global conspiracy to create a baby-selling access but if you think that they are completely unconnected and that at no time does the U.K. law-makers look at other country systems then I think you are naive.