It sadly doesn't work like that.
Harry made his application ages ago and there was further delay while the Supreme Court decided if they were going to hear it - they decided no. So doesn't look as if Court of Appeal will want to wait to see what happens to me and Miss B.
Court of Appeal will therefore rule on Harry's case which is purely Article 10 based; i.e. guidance infringes his right to protected political speech and there is no proportionate justification for it (police have confirmed they do not monitor which 'hate incidents' turn into 'hate crimes)
If he wins then there is no point in me or Miss B proceeding.
If he loses then there is still point in me and Miss B proceeding as we have different arguments - i am saying its a breach of Article 8 and data protection law and Miss B is arguing from the perspective of a child at school who doesn't want her school conversations recorded by police.
But if me and Miss B then lose and WE appeal it would make sense for all three cases to be bundled up and heard directly by the Supreme Court as we are all attacking the same thing, albeit at different angles.
But you don't keep getting extra bites at the cherry. if the CoA rule against Harry on Article 10, then that part of my argument about Article 10 in the High Court won't be heard - a higher court has already decided it.
It's clearly an important issue so i would have thought that it made sense to bundle all cases together and hear all the arguments at one time, rather than piecemeal. But its tricky as our applications are at such different stages - mine was only made in January 2021, Harry has been going for nearly 2 years now.