What we think makes no difference, therefore I prefer to cling to the hope the glass is half full.
Throwing others under the bus is part, presumably, of getting to the position of power to do rather better things?
The U.S.A system is complex, to put it mildly. but it seems there is a possibility yet to come, where Biden /Harris might get more control and be able to change the overbearing influence of religious misogyny.
That's why I'm heartened by the quote of her asking "What law gives government power over MEN'S bodies?"
Biden is Catholic, but said not to believe his belief should be inflicted on others.
To me, it would seem obvious that anyone with a religious belief that termination is murder, must be allowed (i.e. expected) to declare conflict of interest. Lawyers and judges are perfectly accustomed to setting aside their bias. However, to believe that one will burn forever in the eternal fires of hell, if one arrives at the 'wrong' verdict, is an intolerable position for a judge to be placed in.
S/he might be able to sentence their own dear old granny or DC to jail, and remain impartial. But they wouldn't be expected to try. Yet eternal hell fire is even more of a bias-inducer than having a cross granny or DC