Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

For anyone who thinks calling pregnant women 'birthing people' is not a big deal, here's where that leads

160 replies

Clymene · 26/10/2020 19:00

Femcare is an organisation in Canada which provides education and advocacy around periods, seeks to end period poverty and end the stigma and health issues associated with periods.

Look at this tweet in their series about PCOS: 'another complication that may arise as a result of polycystic ovary syndrome is a menstruator having a miscarriage or premature birth of the baby'

A woman who is pregnant is not menstruating you fucking idiots. AngryAngryAngry

This is where this shitty language gets us. Organisations which are created and funded for women's health have completely erased us.

We are menstruators, birth givers, ovary havers.

Ps I am gratified to see that my iPad doesn't like the word menstruator. I'm sure that will change with the next update Hmm

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
twoglassesofprosecco · 26/10/2020 19:47

I just looked at their website. Founded and mostly run by women, but their Director of Digital Marketing is.... drumroll... a man (aka a spaffer)

Clymene · 26/10/2020 19:49

I notice one of their board is wearing a hijab. I wonder if she's wearing it because she is a menstruator or just because she identifies as one?

OP posts:
Whatwouldscullydo · 26/10/2020 19:50
Angry

Even when talking about miscarriage they cant even use the word women can they.

Fuck off.

Wtf is this shit

EdgeOfACoin · 26/10/2020 19:53

I went to their website. It said: periods aren’t a ‘woman’ thing.

What, pray tell, is a 'woman thing'?

Perhaps someone could enlighten me.

ByGrabtharsHammerWhatASavings · 26/10/2020 19:56

It's hilarious to me how they're all soooo desperate NOT to let women be identified as a biological sex class. But when they want to describe the set of people formally known as women how do they do it? By referring exclusively to our different female specific biological functions. Because that's the only thing that unifies us as a group, our biology and the unique challenges associated with it. It's so fucking stupid that I feel like my eyes will start bleeding each time I read it.

Menstruators. What garbage. After the birth of my second child neither I nor my husband menstruated for the next 14 months. But only 1 of us felt the need to ask the health visitor if that was normal. I wonder why that could be 🤔. Morons.

PurpleHoodie · 26/10/2020 19:56

Canada is a worldwide lesson in "PR the Leadership"

CaraDuneRedux · 26/10/2020 20:04

Christ on a bike - from the Twitter feed:
"One of the partners of Fem Care is the Minister for Women and Gender Equality."
(One Maryam Monsef.)

EdgeOfACoin · 26/10/2020 20:06

[quote Awning10]... and from their website:

crimsonconversations.andsisters.co.uk/femcare-and-trans-community/[/quote]
You can email them here:

[email protected]

OneEpisode · 26/10/2020 20:09

Did anyone notice “ We’ve all been there – curled up on the sofa with a hot water bottle, a bar of chocolate and a good chick flick streaming on Netflix.”
In the middle of that “Femcare and the trans community” post above.
Do transmen all like chocolate?
Non-binary menustrators all like chick flicks?

twoglassesofprosecco · 26/10/2020 20:12

Nice messaging.

Paraphrase: "Hey! Those ('women' in old money) with PCOS may have trouble breastfeeding and might not produce enough milk! Byee!"

Translated as: you might not have enough to worry about, so here are a few more things. Happy fretting, menstruators.

For anyone who thinks calling pregnant women 'birthing people' is not a big deal, here's where that leads
ClosetGC · 26/10/2020 20:13

I am so angry about this. What the hell are they playing at?

I wonder if overt cases like this could actually be effective at convincing some of the well-intentioned (but naive) wokies that removal of the word "woman" actually has serious consequences, and that "be kind" can work multiple ways. This kind of language, used in this context, is so clearly inappropriate, that I would hope it might stir a few brain cells.

Probably wishful thinking, but one can hope.

WeeBisom · 26/10/2020 20:14

This language upsets me so much. I don't understand how WE are the ones accused of 'reducing people to body parts' when all we ask for is that female human beings be referred to as women. I'm not a fucking menstruator. My university has just been boasting about how much it's going to do for "Movember" - apparently there will be loads of activities to raise money and awareness for "men's" health and "male" mental health issues. As blood usual, there isn't a single 'ejaculator' or 'prostate-haver' to be seen. Men get the dignity to be called men, and meanwhile I am literally referenced by my reproductive function.

thinkingaboutLangCleg · 26/10/2020 20:15

I well recall the horror of ‘menstruating’ while pregnant (miscarriages).

That’s heartbreaking, Dozer. Flowers

Shame on Femcare. I wonder why they alienate their target audience? I wouldn’t seek help from an organisation that shows such contempt for women.

MichelleofzeResistance · 26/10/2020 20:18

Yeah. Too cynical now to summon up the will to point out the sheer dickish insensitivity of this, but I will signpost the obvious point.

They have made the whopping mistake of using 'menstruator' to mean woman. Adult human female. Because it's inevitable that a word for that collective class. Mistake because it gets in the way of the point, which was supposedly that biological function wasn't sex connected: they're calling pregnant people etc menstruators when they really aren't menstruating.

So we have the whole dehumanising. The reducing of women to body parts. The half assed attempt to join the pretence that there's no such thing as women by replacing one word for another. And any second now the outrage will start that there's a word in disguise meaning 'woman' that's attached to a female anatomy only bodily function and this is exclusionary to male born people.

So menstruator will become hate speech in three, two...…

MichelleofzeResistance · 26/10/2020 20:21

Because it's inevitable that a word specifically for that collective class *is needed when talking about things regarding that collective class that require shared meaning.

balla20 · 26/10/2020 20:44

@Clymene

It's so reductive

littlbrowndog · 26/10/2020 20:45

But look at their twitter feed. And look at how many followers they have

They are a bunch of grifters

Going to explore a bit more

balla20 · 26/10/2020 20:48

As anyone lobbied male focused charities to change their language?

nepeta · 26/10/2020 22:21

@balla20

As anyone lobbied male focused charities to change their language?
I don't think trans activists aim their activism at those, to be honest. Or it could be that men simply don't care to be 'inclusive.' It would be fun to know which the case might be.

So we should probably start lobbying them. I am thinking of good alternatives. Ejaculators, prostate-owners, bepenised people, erectors.

SusannaSpider · 26/10/2020 22:41

I can't imagine a transman would be overjoyed at being called a menstruator either.

Deliriumoftheendless · 26/10/2020 23:03

Tough shit, it’s inclusive. It’s kind.

Clymene · 26/10/2020 23:08

@Deliriumoftheendless

Tough shit, it’s inclusive. It’s kind.
It's so weird how women are supposed to roll over and give every word we have that defines us away. And when we say that's not inclusive or kind of our feelings or wishes, we're met with aggression.

It smells a lot like misogyny to me. You know, in the if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck kind of way.

OP posts:
Coffeeoverload · 26/10/2020 23:14

💔 No words...

HecatesCats · 26/10/2020 23:17

So menstruator will become hate speech in three, two...…

I mean you have to laugh

NarcissistsEyebrows · 26/10/2020 23:18

Delirium but how is it kind to refer to someone with a pos-related miscarriage as a menstruator? Surely their menstruation itself is a painful indication that a wanted pregnancy is no longer going ahead?

And what about the many many women who find the term offensive, reductive, cold, upsetting, and not a label they want? Why is a label which someone wants to use defined as kind when many of the people it refers to take it as unkind? Who wins this game of top trumps and gets to define what kind is, and who gets bequeathed kindness and who has to shut the fuck up and be treated like crap?

Oh, a biological man gets to decide? Of course, how did I not guess...

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread