Conference to "Make women great again"

[LongPauseNoReply]

"A Male-Hosted Conference Will Teach Women How to Achieve True Femininity in 2020" the article says.

I really really want femininity and how to be a woman mansplained to me by dudes. I can't think of anyone with more experience of what it's like to be a woman ....

medium.com/fearless-she-wrote/a-male-hosted-conference-will-teach-women-how-to-achieve-true-femininity-in-2020-f4ae63f0a7ca

Like those stupid MAGA hats that trump had.

At the time I wanted to know - when was America last great?

Similarly someone should ask these wankers exactly when they think women used to be great.

1950s? Ancient Greece? Last week?

I reckon it’s actually teaching women how to be subservient and how to put up with all the shit your man does because real women are seen not heard or some other such shite.

I think I remember this being held last year too. Ugh.

Sounds like a total sausage fest!

@midclegs

I think I remember this being held last year too. Ugh.

Yup, sadly this appears to be an annual event.

I wonder if any women show up, or if it ends up with MRAs talking to each other.

Could we send a mole? I'm too busy unfortunately..

Surely it’s just telling us pesky females we must never:

Disagree with your man.
Go above a size 12 (U.K.)
Refuse to be a baby creating factory
Breastfeed (breasts belong to your husband)

You MUST:

Keep house spotless at all times
Never complain
Be available to your husband at all times
Suck husband to sleep every night

There ya go, job done.

Saw this last year🤢

I've just googled that name. He looks like Danielle Ratcliffe in some of the pics and he is actually wearing a MAGA-style hat! Does he remind anyone else of Tom Cruise in Magnolia?

Have they abbreviated the title and it should be
'How to make women great with child again: a return to patriarchal control and exploitation of women and their fertility"?

Who the heck attends something like that?

@BaronEssoStation

I've just googled that name. He looks like Danielle Ratcliffe in some of the pics and he is actually wearing a MAGA-style hat! Does he remind anyone else of Tom Cruise in Magnolia?

Who's Danielle Ratcliffe?

Who's Danielle Ratcliffe?

Either a joke or a typo, presumably.

Daniel Radcliffe.

Yes, it was a joke.

Who the heck attends something like that?

I'd love to know. Two thousand dollars a pop so presumably rich people. They could've written it all down in a book for twenty dollars so I guess rich and gullible?

@ErrolTheDragon

Have they abbreviated the title and it should be 'How to make women great with child again: a return to patriarchal control and exploitation of women and their fertility"?

Who the heck attends something like that?

We need to find the poor women who believe these men know better than them about what it means to be a woman and save them....

I can guess that it's very vulnerable women with masses of internalised misogyny, low self-esteem, even lower self worth and zero confidence.

@BaronEssoStation

Daniel Radcliffe.

Yes, it was a joke.

It was quite excellent.

This is obviously a spoof, like Landover Baptist Church.
Isn't it?

@Falleninwiththewrongcrowd

This is obviously a spoof, like Landover Baptist Church. Isn't it?

I’m afraid it’s not

Ears.

Conference is all about explaining to women biologically and naturally who they are as feminine beings.

Aka woman = feminine being.

Sounds right up the genderists' alley to me.

I'm intrigued by the idea that femininity can be dialled up by 500% though. How is this measured?

As for the trillion dollar feminist establishment, all I can say is

And I'm totally fucked on how to be a beautiful woman - the only thing on that list I manage is the long hair, which I'm thinking of shaving off. But it says shaving is beautiful so I will still score one point.

Thanks OP, I needed a hearty chuckle today.

I'm intrigued by the idea that femininity can be dialled up by 500% though. How is this measured?

Fellow ladies, I bring you the pink-sparkle-ometer (TM).

Place sample in front of white light source. Measure

1. the albedo (we want lots of light reflected)
2. the range of angles the light is reflected through (sparkly glitter should reflect in lots of directions)
3. it should be a mixture of light reflected at approx 625 to 740nm and 440 to 485 nm (with other wavelengths being absorbed) so that the human eye perceives it as magenta.

(Hopefully this pseudo science hokum complete crock of bullshit should be just the sort of thing blokes signing up to this conference - who have learned all their "science" from YouTube - will absolutely lap up.)

Would the Twilight vampires be considered the height of femininity using this metric? Have not actually seen it but am told they sparkle.