It's depressing. In the article she says that certain things, like whether women are innately less intelligent than men, should not be up for debate. I can get why she says that, but why does she have to use a term like "fetishise"? People who believe in debate don't "fetishise" it, they just believe in it. Given the context, it's a really unfortunate choice of word.
She also says things like:
"I would challenge anyone to sit and listen to the story of any trans person without feeling anything but shock and compassion. You will have trouble finding any trans person who doesn’t tell you a backstory including some level of alienation, loss of family, bullying, persecution, difficulties with accessing appropriate healthcare and worse."
But the truth is, while I've seen quite a few stories of trans people that left me shocked, there have also been plenty that didn't arouse any compassion at all, including the large numbers of rich white men who then become trans women and get lauded for how brave they are. Caitlin Jenner. Pips Bunce. Sue Pascoe. Or the ones who turn out to have a disturbing interest in pornography, such as Julie Marshall, sentenced the other day for possessing 6,000 images of child porn. Or the rapist Karen White. Or our little friend Jessica Yaniv, who likes asking teenage girls about menstruation. Or that lovely person in the Guardian the other day (forgot the name) who likes putting tampons up their bum. Sorry to disappoint, Nadia, but I don't have compassion for any of those people.