Billi77 to make sure we're talking about the same concepts, I'd love to know the following:
When you say TWAW and refer to transitioning, what does that mean?
Pre- or post-op transsexuals who suffer from sex dysphoria and wish to, are or already have medically transitioned all the way to genital surgery?
Crossdressers who may or may not suffer from gender dysphoria and who permanently present as the opposite sex, but make no changes to their bodies?
Or individuals who have neither condition, and make no changes whatsoever but identify as trans via a verbal statement of identity alone?
Do you know why single-sex legal set asides* are required to remedy the disadvantage, discrimination and oppression females experience in our world?
Do you understand why including some males in these legal set asides for females leads to the exclusion of various groups of females and therefore renewed disadvantage, discrimination and oppression of at least these groups females?
Can you talk about how working against the interests of at least some groups of females for the sole benefit of one group of males is a feminist endeavour?
I'm not asking you to defend it, to have a detailed cost-benefit analysis or solutions to the issue, I am merely interested in how prioritising the interests of one group of males (however vulnerable) over the interests of various groups of females is rooted in femininism and not, say, in egalitarianism for instance.
Do you accept that other women can chose to campaign to uphold the rights of female people without being motivated by any animosity towards males who identify as trans?
*Such single-sex legal set asides are women's and girls' sports, domestic violence refugees, rape crisis services, prisons, hospital wards, scholarships and awards, all-women shortlists etc. and the right to organise, assemble and campaign as a sex for our own interests.