Let's have a little discussion about "discrimination", shall we?
Women-only sports discriminate against men. Men aren't allowed to take part in them. Is this a bad thing? No, because men have men's sports to take part in. (In fact, on the whole, better funded, better supported sports.) In fact, sports have all sorts of discrimination built into them. Is a heavyweight boxer discriminated against by not being allowed to enter a flyweight competition? Is a 4 times Grand National winner allowed to enter a novice hurdle chase?
We segregate women's sports for reasons to do with the massive biological differences in the extremes of the distribution between men's performance and women's performance. Don't believe me? Have a look at this.
boysvswomen.com/#/
We do this because we don't in general think "fairness" is the same thing as "free for all" - in sport we engineer competitions to allow fairness between matched competitors.
So - in this instance you have a finite size of pie. Look again at those results for women Olympians versus high school boys.
If transgirl Andraya Yearwood (post male puberty, no androgen blockers, no cross sex hormones) decides to enter a girls' high school race, Yearwood will win by a country mile (and has done, repeatedly, unless beaten by another transgirl).
So in this instance giving Yearwood the "right" to enter girls races takes away from girls the "right" to have a fair chance of winning in their own sex category within athletics.
It is a straight either/or, no half-way house, no compromise position possible. Either you allow Yearwood to romp away with the gold, or you give the girls a fair chance to win the gold. But you can't have it both way.
Giving Yearwood what you see as trans rights takes away women's sex-based rights. The two are mutually exclusive.