She said that the only people who have periods are women. Because of the push to remove women from everything to do with their biology. Not that you're not a woman if you don't menstruate.
It was a handful of tweets for God's sake. People can read thousands of abusive messages, but not the four or five she wrote?
She didn't write that, all all, but even if she had written something ambiguous, what the fuck is it with people pretending to misunderstand?
She wrote about women, their periods, the fact that being of the female sex has shaped her life, and that same-sex attraction involves recognising biology. She mentioned a lesbian friend of hers, and published a letter from a lesbian who had been turned on by the LGBT community for being a lesbian.
And yet the first thing Daniel Radcliffe mentions are transwomen? So utterly revealing.
What do women's periods have to do with transwomen? Absolutely nothing.
Except, Daniel knows full well, that it is transwomen who are driving this, because no one listens to women, however they identify. And transwomen want to eliminate every trace of the biological differences between them and women. We see it all the time.
Monroe Bergdorf said that women could take part in the women's march as long as they didn't mention anything to do with their reproductive biology. I have seen hundreds and hundreds of transwomen tell women their biology is disgusting, or irrelevant, or offensive, and no transmen. (Maybe one, being used as a pawn by others.)
Daniel Radcliffe does not understand the issues here. I'd bet £1000 that Daniel Radcliffe has never even heard of AGP. Has never looked at the Stonewall definition of transwomen. Doesn't have a clue what is being taught in schools and that the CPS have decided to force girls to accept boys as friends on pain of hate crime accusations.
If Daniel Radcliffe is happy that young girls and women are being forced to undress with boys and men, then that's on him.
What is unforgivable isn't that he's disagreed with J. K. Rowling, he hasn't, he hasn't addressed anything she said, what he's done is stand behind those who are yelling violent, disgusting, misogynistic abuse at her and urged them on.
However, this was predicted. Narcissistic meltdown. It's grim and it's ugly.
But this is just the beginning. The discussion is going to keep going.
At the moment, it's outrageous to the women who understand, precisely because we do. understand.
We are wearing the right spectacles, and we can instantly see things, like Daniel Radcliffe's bias and why he has it.
And we absolutely know is that he is ignorant. As soon as you start asking the right questions, like do you believe rapists should be in female prisons, that women should have no say in whether or not they are forced to undress in front of men, etc, the issues become clear.
Daniel Radcliffe talks about gay and lesbian people - sexual orientations that he has absolutely no hope of ever describing. How is he campaigning for it?