"There is a binary but I'm not part of it" - I read that as "I'm not prepared to argue about this proposed binary, but it definitely doesn't describe me." A fudge, to avoid making a definitive statement either way.
I agree jelly, there is also an element of female puberty being a right pain in the backside, but again, there's a language access issue. Here we have the tools to separate it out, into a) physical stuff e.g. periods being a trial b) social ramifications of physical stuff e.g. suddenly losing personhood and being demoted to sex object c) identity formation when the dominant cultural narrative is transgenderism.
But they're not allowed to separate it out. They can't talk about a) properly (because of that social suicide risk) and they can't talk about b) because that would be questioning other women's choices and not celebrating hypersexualised femininity as a valid choice (social suicide again).
They aren't allowed to say "I am a girl and I fucking hate my biology and its social ramifications." The ideology doesn't permit it.
Maybe I'm being too nice, but I try to look past the words. And the thing, the internal experience, that NBs report? It's not bollocks, and most of us here went through it too. But we have the language to describe it, and they don't.
That's why we have to be vilified. So that our language, feminist language, that makes coherent sense of the experience of being female under patriarchy, is denied to the young.
It was ever thus.