Shouldn't Zoe be prioritising older people, the most vulnerable population, above a bunch of petulant triviality activists? (tantrum activists?) Are older people going to know what the fuck "sex assigned at birth" even means? Any competent English speaker is going to be extremely confused by that phrase.
If not offending TRAs is genuinely such a huge priority, why don't they put "sex recorded at birth?" This has the advantage of being accurate, unlike "assigned" and therefore much less confusing for people who don't know the jargon.
And it doesn't go against any of the rules of trans religion because they can pretend the wrong sex was recorded if they like - it is in no way implying they actually are their actual sex, which I appreciate would be blasphemous.
"Sex recorded at birth" seems like it should be a very workable solution that meets everyone's needs/"needs"- but then more and more it seems like TRAs don't want actual solutions to their purported problems, they just want to make people speak nonsense catechisms as part of the power trip. That birthing leaflet that was posted here recently is another example - it could have been written non-confusingly even within genderist rules, but it wasn't. I suspect that clunky confusing language which excludes much of the target audience is a more satisfying signal of obeisance.
Also, fuck "Zoe", they aren't getting my data. Maybe I would have once thought this didn't matter much and it is worth co-operating with them despite it. But now I see that making a consistent fuss over trivialities, prioritising their egos over the common good, is how TRAs have been eroding women's rights. And it's only worked because people expect women not to do the same. I'd encourage everyone reading to delete this app. If they can't respect us, they can fuck off.