Soph you articulate my thoughts brilliantly too.
I think that's why I felt so disappointed last night.
Women, as a collective (Mumsnet), were the butt of the joke. The young male students by me found this particularly hilarious.
Women are fair game. Easy to attack as a group. Cheap laughs. But he couldn't possibly be bigoted because he's progressive and he even makes jokes about 'bigots', right?
As part of his clear lack of respect for women,
Lee referenced Mumsnet frequently, alongside his sneering at The Telegraph, Daily Mail, Brexiteers and Tories. This air of moral superiority, this wokeness, bugs me, because that in itself is a narrow minded world view.
Does he really think those women on here that did subscribe to The Guardian and Labour (just using examples he would 'approve' of) that protested section 28 and marched against fascism, suddenly all woke up one day upon hearing about the Gender Recognition Act and decided to do a complete U turn?
The irony is that his beloved paper of choice could not even print the word 'woman' in an editorial last year, while the Daily Mail ran an excellent piece yesterday about Harry Miller and The Sun
featured an equally robust piece on the 4,000 per cent rise in girls being referred to 'gender' clinics.
The Guardian believes that humans can change sex, that men's feelings trump women's rights, safety and dignity, and that experimenting on confused children is to be applauded.
While Labour supports self ID and encourages males (including Stewart's pal Eddie Izzard) to steal women's places on female shortlists.
doubly sad when a woman does it. way to demonstrate that internalised misogyny
Agree.