Maya Forstater court case

[Bardonnay]

Sorry to link to the DM but they've covered Maya Forstater's upcoming court case here:
https://mol.im/a/7683207.

Maya's account of events is here and her post links to updates about the case: https://medium.com/@MForstater/i-lost-my-job-for-speaking-up-about-womens-rights-2af2186ae84

What's interesting is that I'm finding it harder to follow today's tweets. It's clearly not WWWC as she is an excellent live tweeter. I think it's indicative of what an incredible clear and concise witness Maya was on Friday.

This witness is just garbled nonsense.

@OvaHere there are some suggesting on Twitter that the thread is being mass reported (who would do a thing like that 🤔) hence why it seems to disappear and reappear.

Is anyone saving it periodically?

I have to say that I think Maya's well out of that place. It sounds like an absolute hive of wokeness. I'd be driven insane.

I think the judge is on side

The RW is just digging that hole.

Now saying he finds it "outrageous" to think that men would pretend to be women to rape a women on a sleeper train.

Wow

Yeah cos men have never gone to ridiculous lengths to find victims have they?

No doubt some new poster will be along in a moment to liven up the thread and try to have it deleted that way.

CGD HR director has just said that at CGD Rachel Dolezal would be to all intents and purposes black. If wildwomanwritingclub has recorded events faithfully, Maya's counsel said 'isn't the reality that she's not black', and he has replied the reality is she's black

Good. Grief. This is barking mad

Sorry wrong thread.

He's now essentiially pretending he doesn't understand the question about what consideration was given to women's views. He simply cannot frame an answer.

Not sure what planet this witness is from.

How fucking stupid do you have to be to not realise that some men will abuse this? Look at the lengths Jimmy Saville went to to abuse children! Or perhaps these misogynists think that identifying as a woman is so demeaning that even a paedophile or rapist wouldn't defile themselves to that extent.

Witness now doesn't understand what 'consideration for women' is.

Imagine admitting that in court.

How fucking stupid do you have to be to not realise that some men will abuse this?

These people are not stupid, this is the real end goal.

The twitter thread is chunk after chunk of solid gold. Please please can someone save it in case it goes pouff. I have no idea how.

perhaps these misogynists think that identifying as a woman is so demeaning that even a paedophile or rapist wouldn't defile themselves to that extent.

And yet..

^CC - would CGD hire a secretary who couldn’t type but identified as a typist?

RW - [swerves question]^

Not sure what planet this witness is from.

Planet man, is where he lives. He hasn't noticed women, well not until they said something men didn't like.

I’m at the tribunal. Person sitting a few down from me who I think is for the employer was on this thread on her phone. That might explain some of the reporting.

Does anyone know what happens to thread unrolls if the tweets are deleted/reported?

This poor fella is finding his woke training to be a bit useless in a tribunal.

I’m at the tribunal. Person sitting a few down from me who I think is for the employer was on this thread on her phone. That might explain some of the reporting.

Waves at monitors. Chin up, you're probably going to need some and after all this.

This poor fella is finding his woke training to be a bit useless in a tribunal.

In his own reality it's going really well.

I'm actually wondering how noisy we should be about the employers' counsel's mistakes. If this thread is being read etc

Yeah pygmy. Gin needed for you after

In his own reality it's going really well.

Which is his right and it's offensive to suggest otherwise.