Labour want to clarify that changing one's legal sex does not alter their biological sex

[omikron]

Clarify the distinction between legal and biological sex. I think it is in the best interests of society as a whole if the law is based on facts and words used in the law have their ordinary meaning in English. I would like to see it clarified that a change of legal sex does not alter a person's biological sex, which remains relevant in some circumstances.

This is good isn't it?

Where have they said this?

Can you clarify that?

yes, please give us more details OP

I will believe it when I see it. And I still want legal protection to be based around biological not legal sex.

Where have you got this from?

I Googled; its been suggested to the policy forum but its not been accepted as policy. Its pretty similar to the current law.

www.policyforum.labour.org.uk/commissions/reform-of-the-gender-recognition-act

Perhaps the OP is The Voice Of The Labour Party and this is on the first tablet to be brought down the mountain to us. Not.

Maybe it is using the "want" in "Labour want to clarify" in a similar way to how it's used in, "you want a smack", or "you want a nap" or even "a single man ... is in want of a wife"

I've just read Allin-Khan's sickening, morally bankrupt reply to a constituent of hers, full of falsehoods about WPUK. There is no way the claim in the OP can be true.

It's bizarre to see a doctor pretending she can't tell women from men.

Is this on another thread alltheprettyseahorses?

The Labour Party still can't construct a coherent policy about Brexit. This is an irrelevant side issue for most people so has no chance of having any joined up thinking applied to it (assuming the Labour party is still capable of joined up thinking on anything- which is not a given)

Offs.

I will believe this when I see it OP, not holding my breath !

''The protest against WPUK’s A Woman’s Place is At Conference event was endorsed from the platform at Momentum’s The World Transformed event''
morningstaronline.co.uk/article/f/wpuk-fringe-report

''Jeremy Corbyn is at odds with his own domestic policy adviser, Lachlan Stuart, who has said that trans women remain “biologically male”.
''In October last year Corbyn told the PinkNews Awards that “Labour supports reform of the Gender Recognition Act and the Equality Act to allow for self-declaration”.
www.thetimes.co.uk/article/corbyn-and-policy-adviser-in-split-over-transgender-women-dz97pw7mq

''Jeremy Corbyn – We must reject ‘horrible’ anti-transgender rights campaign''
www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/jeremy-corbyn-we-must-reject-horrible-anti-transgender-rights-campaign/05/07/

“A hostile environment for transgender people” – Dawn Butler responds to delay in publishing Gender Recognition Act consultation''
labour.org.uk/press/hostile-environment-transgender-people-dawn-butler-responds-delay-publishing-gender-recognition-act-consultation/

Perhaps OP can clarify what they mean, because there's nothing to support their statement.

Ah so someone has suggested a fact to Labour and we're just waiting to see if they might ratify it?

Ok.

isn't that meaningless?

ok, biology can't changed!
but legally he is she!

is that word salad?
i can find no difference.

Any news on them engaging with reality yet?

Stares into space.

I fucking really laughed at that. 🥊🤣🤣🤣

They obviously think that GC women are silly little bigots that they can throw a few crumbs to, in order to get their vote for Christmas. We.don’t.believe.you!

biologically miss yaniv is male.
but legally woman present be used to force religious woman waxing her.
matter of law.

Good to have you back lbd