We're getting told off by people on the AIBU thread for calling it grooming.
Too close to the bone, eh, AIBU.
Dog - grooming is traditionally seen as the actions of one individual gradually seeking control over another individual (usually one with less power and/or status).
Here, we're taking the models and language developed by child protection and the women's sector to describe the ways in which queer theory has gained pernicious influence and is using the same tactics and strategies but on a societal rather than an individual level.
So here - no need for an individual to groom a child: institutions have already done it.
It's the same with, say, complaining about the mods here on FWR acting as agents of coercive control on a wider scale than the one-on-one domestic abuse it was developed for.
Or the ways in which we apply the concepts of gaslighting and DARVO to transactivism - again, language taken from the women's sector analysing one-one domestic abuse and recognising the same dynamics and strategies in a social movement as a whole.
Open your eyes, AIBU.