Just for the shits and giggles. Why do you do this to every thread you're on, Roses? Surely you can't actually enjoy it?
Datun asked: Would it be possible to have CCTV absolutely everywhere? With random inspections of said footage?
Roses approved: I agree this would be a good solution if it would be possible
Lang disapproved of Rose approving: You think that exploitative employment contracts requiring women in sex work to be filmed at all times is better than one-off whistleblowing investigations in cases of consistent and persistent regulatory failure?
Rose got her Datuns and her Langs muddled: it was put across as a genuine solution by yourself until I dared toagreewith you
Lang pointed out it was not she: I suggested fixed and permanent CCTV in work places as a good solution? I think not.
Datun concurred: Lang didn't say anything,roses. I asked a question. I do it a lot. It's how I find stuff out.
Roses contiinued to get her Datuns and Langs muddled: Seeing as it was YOU who posed it as a serious solution in order to perform a gotcha says a hell of a lot more about you than you'll ever realise.
Datun repeats an explanation of Roses muddle: Oh dear roses. Lang and I are different people. I asked a question. Not Lang.
Roses, well, uk ok hun?: The comment still stands to Lang then -Seeing as it was YOU who posed it as a serious solution in order to perform a gotcha says a hell of a lot more about you than you'll ever realise
I'm bored now. Rinse and repeat ad infinitum. Until we get to forty pages, obvs.