For anyone newly joining this thread on Sunday morning, this YT channel has eight videos from the hearing 17 July.
That a supposedly sane govt in a sophisticated, civilised country could have voted for new laws that have facilitated insanity is mind-boggling.
In one video Yaniv suddenly claims to have a vulva and the defence lawyer points out that in all the months of preparation and all the paperwork Yaniv provided, this had never been mentioned -- in fact, JY had repeatedly stated that genitals are male ~ and indeed, this is the crux that the entire case hinges on!
So the lawyer says, OK a medical examination will settle this ambiguity, and Yaniv refuses, and states that the genitals in question, be they male or female, are irrelevant.
Surely when Yaniv refused to have the matter cleared up by an independent medical professional the tribunal should have been ended by someone in charge. Is anyone in charge any more?
www.youtube.com/channel/UCB3MxRIg1Tc3vxvy-2Uluug
www.youtube.com/channel/UCB3MxRIg1Tc3vxvy-2Uluug