We can now name Jonathan Yaniv

[CuriousaboutSamphire]

Canadian Member has lifted the ban after warning him his continued tweeting would make things difficult for him.

Being reported widely across Reddit and Canadian SocMed

I’ve saved that picture because if anyone in RL says TWAW I am going to let them have it with both barrels & Jonathan/Jessica Yaniv is going to provide the ammunition.

It’s like an alternative universe where everything that ever made sense to you has been completely reversed. The Upsidedown. Wonky World.

The picture in the ballgown was taken when Yaniv was speaking at the Langley Township Council meeting - apparently they have regular meetings which members of the public are allowed to speak at for five minutes on issues which concern them. Yaniv makes regular appearances.

I’d do a 5 minute slot on our friend with the coconuts

I'm currently in Portugal - not sure if it makes a difference - and I'm delighted that if I Google his name, the first result is PREDATOR - Joanthan Yaniv..... How long before mainstream media start shouting this from the rooftops??

This image is more relevant to the court case. This is what Jonathan Yaniv looked like when Yaniv was asking women to wax balls.

I generally don't comment on people's personal appearance. It's not the thing I notice first. But the photos are singularly unappealing.

Doubly I'd say.

And I'm at the context. Wtf has it got to do with Yaniv?

I watched his council video not envy
From what I remember he wasn't asked to speak, they have slots where any member of the public can speak and he took advantage of that to make an arse of himself

Has anyone else seen the delightful Yaniv’s latest Facebook video
Brain tumour? Check.
Gynae visit? Check.
Apparently severe neurological symptoms that mean complete exhaustion. Presumably, performing in court is no problem though.
There are not enough words to describe this piece of human excrement.

Damn, I tried really hard not to "misgender" as I want my post to stand! Will try again.

This is Yaniv in a ladies' toilet. Yaniv appears to be looking at a young girl in the background.

Yaniv likes to engage young girls in conversations online how to deal with girls talking to Yaniv about starting their periods, randomly, in the toilet (as if any girl would approach Yaniv for advice on this). (See [[https://mirandayardley.com/en/jonathan-yaniv-is-a-predator/
Miranda's article]] for proof of this).

I bet the TRA movement would love to divorce themselves from these antics.

And there is the rub.
If anyone says that this person isn’t a genuine transwoman then you open Pandora’s box.
Why make an exception for this one person? I’m sure this person is not the only one to act like this. Who gets to police it? Who gets to decide?

"I bet the TRA movement would love to divorce themselves from these antics."
Well, they can't. "Acceptance without exception", Stonewall declared. By their own words, they cannot claim he's not genuine, because they'd be making an exception. Hoist on their own petard.

One good thing

This person can peak trans the nation in one fell swoop

If a man dresses as a priest to rape little boys, we do not think he is a priest.
If a man pretends to be blind to collect disability benefits, we do not think he is blind.
If a man pretends to be a minor to chat up girls online we do not think he is a minor.
Why if a man pretends to be a woman to abuse little girls we have to accept he is a woman?

Some of his conversations are included in this article. It really shows what a paedo creep he is:
www.thepostmillennial.com/the-truth-about-jessica-yaniv-is-beginning-to-emerge/

mobile.twitter.com/maitlis/status/1152107842968707072

He is a revolting specimen tbh. But doing wonders in peaking people. If only more press would pick up on it. Have pretty much only seen one article about him, and it was largely sympathetic. The journalist must have done a hell of a lot of work to be able to spin this into a 'poor jonathon' story

Why if a man pretends to be a woman to abuse little girls we have to accept he is a woman?

I believe the argument is ‘because shut up, that’s why.’

Has this person left Twitter or just blocked me?
Can't find them on there.

Jessica is on Canadian radio again now (after being on the same show yesterday) and the host seems to be being a bit tougher on her.

She has denied that she sent the tampon messages. I wonder if they were sent when she was Jonathon and therefore can be erased from
Her past?

I bet the TRA movement would love to divorce themselves from these antics.

Yaniv is as much a TW as any other TW. This is exactly what the ideology is. And I'm not going to say this is what self ID is, because if Yaniv lived in the UK they could get a GRC and be legally recognised in Yaniv's right to be treated as a woman. Unless there are clear legal lines held between the fact of biological sex and personal free choices of gender expression, and third spaces provided for those who prefer not to use to spaces for their biological sex, women as a sex class are under threat and this is incompatible with respect for women, equality for women, safety for women and safeguarding in general. Or preventing fetishists and abusive males preying on women, while exploiting the law to enable and validate their behaviour.

What is this erasing the past nonsense and how is it lawful? Even if we were to believe that a man can become a woman, are we expected to further believe that they didn’t in fact exist at all become becoming female? It’s mind blowing