This article was written after the Commonwealth Games last year, but I think it is worth posting for its thoughtful analysis of the problems surrounding the inclusion of Laurel Hubbard in women's weightlifting.
Laurel Hubbard is both a formidable weightlifter and a human conundrum. Born in New Zealand in 1978, she lived until her early thirties as Gavin, the child of a former mayor of Auckland. Then she decided to transition to become female and to compete as an elite athlete using her reassigned gender. The upshot? A labyrinthine legal and ethical mess, for which the Commonwealth Games offer just a fleeting platform. Come the Tokyo Olympics in 2020, Hubbard is likely to present such an insoluble dilemma that her case will make Bleak House's Jarndyce versus Jarndyce seem a pushover
The essential problem with Hubbard is the amount of residual benefit she carries from living the majority of her life as a man. On average, men outperform women in weightlifting and other strength events by as much as 25 per cent, courtesy of bigger lungs, stronger bones and greater muscle mass. The athletic advantage that Hubbard has herself gleaned suggests as much. As a man, the Kiwi scarcely registered in the sport at international level. Today, as a woman, she is a world-beater, having already broken Commonwealth records and won a silver medal at her maiden world championships.
Still, the Commonwealth Games Federation (CGF) allowed her to perform in Gold Coast, upholding its credo of "fairness, non-discrimination and inclusion"
The point is, 'fairness' to transgender athletes means that women athletes then experience discrimination and exclusion from their chosen sports.
www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12029454