Apparently, "if you want equality then this is what happens". Sometimes I think it must be easier to be a blinded handmaiden of the patriarchy!
Not only is that vile, it's also untrue. Does anyone seriously believe he'd have attacked a male protester in that way? I very much doubt it. He attacked the woman because he could: because she was smaller, lighter and weaker than he was. And almost certainly unarmed, because, as we all know, armed attacks by women are exceptionally rare.
People defending an act of male violence against a defenceless woman sicken me to the core. Utterly despicable.