We all know the idea of what's feminine is a social construct.
However it doesnt matter. Rejected everything classed as feminine doesnt make anyone better than anyone else. Why would it be better, if a woman rejected anything deemed feminine. Just because its deemed feminine.
Besides, thisbisnt what bothered the OP. She dosesnt like then and doesnt want women to wear them because it holds women back.
Let's be clear. Women may feel pressure to do certain things, but when it comes to nails 2 posters out of alot, say they have had negative comments about their nails. It's not something that happens alot. Shouldnt happen at all. But as this thread shows, some people are dicks and will have a dig. More than 2 posters have been deeply derogatory about women that do have them done.
There isnt this huge pressure. They dont hold women back. Any woman that wanted a career or to do a hobby that was incompatible with having long nails, wouldn't have long nails.
The OP is a gp. She wants to be a gp and doesnt have long nails. The 'trend' for long nails, didnt stop her and wouldnt stop another woman.
Its not a huge trend, more women dont have them than do.
Despite 'feminine' things being a social construct, women still have the ability to choose. Some women choose long nails. Some dont.
Ops campaign, is based on a load of bollocks about giving women their hands back. Shockingly women have their hands, they can choose what they do with them. They dont need some ridiculous campaign, to make them see they may not want them.