Jonathan Yaniv

[invinoveritaserum]

Having familiarised myself with this person, how in the name of holy fuck has he not been arrested? He seems to be laughing at people while hiding in plain sight. So very, very disturbing.

Bertrandrussell: 'What people say is important- not how they look.'

1. Yaniv says things about helping young girls insert tampons in mixed sex changing areas, so pretty important, yes.

1. Although I'd normally agree with you about tolerance regards what someone chooses to wear, what if that person is getting off on obliging their audience to be unwilling participants in their sexual fetish? That would be abusive and important to the people involved (potentially all of us on social media, I know I'm reaching for the eyeball bleach)

1. What middle aged, overweight woman would get away with turning up to give a serious presentation dressed the way this person was dressed and then snickering about their tits falling out? Having been socialised from birth to understand I will publicly get a kicking (maybe metaphorically, but potentially literally) if I dressed as wildly inappropriately as that, I think it's relevant to the debate about 'what makes a woman' and that it's legitimate to mention appearance in this context.

I agree that when appropriate, we should discuss JV's appearance.

If a actual woman turned up at a govt meeting dressed like that, with false tits hanging out, it would be discussed everywhere, and rightly so. We should call out someone who thinks this is appropriate attire. It's a very large Red Flag.

Omg just watched that video clip, yes in this instance it's totally appropriate to discuss appearance.

He's clearly much cleverer than he appears we need to be asking what that absurd attire at that meeting achieves.

I’m not saying we shouldn’t discuss their appearance because we should be tolerant. I’m saying but because if we focus-as most of the comments on that twitter thread do - on their clothes and looks we risk giving them and their supporters an “out”. We need to focus like lasers on the paedophilia.

“we need to be asking what that absurd attire at that meeting achieves” I

It’s taking people’s minds off the paedophilia and giving them and their supporters an opportunity to point out how unfairly they are being treated.

‘Trump’s wall needs to come here too.’ This is the fucker Twitter is defending.

Apparently thems trying to sue a beauty pageant (that thems was trying to crowd fund the entry fee for themself to enter) for only allowing women to enter.

Someone really does enjoy suing women.

This individual has friends at Twitter, in positions influential enough to ensure he’s protected. Supported.

Twitter has been called out on leaving MAP networks untouched and does not delete tweets that clearly contain worrying content from males in regards to children.

Yes it's definitely all part of the fetish so later They can go home and think "and my clothes were practically falling off and everyone could see" whilst wanking furiously in a Very Womanly Way

Piss off JY. we are not participants in your narcissistic fantasy.

But how come Yaniv messages about young girls and tampons which have been shared with Langley council and yet they still invite Yaniv to speak

And Yaniv talked about young people in the presentation.

Where the fuck has their safeguarding and backbones and brains gone ?

Yaniv also tweets racist stuff as well

It’s all about clothes and sex isn’t it? Just like a woman huh 🙄.

I just can’t go through a whole day without wondering ‘does my tiara match my heels?’, ‘shall I wear the black lame or the gold?’, ‘do my fake boobs looks too big in the plunging neckline, and is the split in my mini skirt high enough to show enough thigh and knickers... and what time is grandpas funeral again?’

I dunno fecko

I think there is a feeling of I can do what the fuck I want and no one can touch me.

Look at me look at me. Invincible

And Canada goes along with it

I can go in ladies loos.

I can do what the fuck I want

I showed a guy the messages about tampons that were sent and girls genitals and he said he felt sick and disturbed by them

This is deeply disturbing and am judging every single law maker, council , government that have let bat shit and disturbing behaviour like this get to this point

This is where Canada now is.

Fear ridden and spineless to protect girls and women

I would only be able to muster up an atom of respect if one of these eedjits turned pretty at an event in a pair of tatty men’s jeans, trainers, a baggy jumper and their hair scraped into a bun with god knows what stuck in it. Also no makeup.

Welcome to ‘girls world’ gents

Actually I’m lying about the respect bit.

That person is clearly unwell.

In a nutshell.

One individual proving, past all doubt, that this is a very exploitable situation for male born people with a whole range of agendas. See: This Never Happens And It Never Happens About Twice A Week.

And like Karen White, it is a catch 22 for TRAs.

Oh that video in the ballgown - just appalling. It's a parody of women isn't it? The tiara, the tits, the heels. Like a five year old playing dress up but infinitely more sinister.

The fact that a person wants to sue a beauty pageant for not letting them enter is another reason it's relevant to discuss their looks. Feminists have been pointing out for decades that beauty contests reduce women to their appearance and create stereotypes of womanhood. Basing one's womanhood in participation in these events undermines that and is detrimental to women.

But also, a 'cis' woman who insisted on taking part without any of the aforementioned stereotypical feminine attributes would get ridiculed. On what basis could they say 'I'm not young, I'm not slim, I have no idea of how to dress attractively and I'm not interested in world peace (my activism has a very different focus and involves hanging round online and in changing rooms talking to young girls about periods). But you have to let me take part or I'll sue.'

If the trans rights movement had actually 'widened the bandwidth' of what it means to be a woman so that we could all break the mold of the old sexist stereotypes, it might have some value. But it hasn't - the only women who can get away with this stuff are the ones who weren't women to start with. Men have more rights than women, even when it comes to being women. The rest of us would still be publicly humiliated if we aspired to a level of conventional attractiveness that we just don't have. If an individual was so lacking in self awareness that they didn't realise how ridiculous they looked, someone would pretty soon point it out to them. This is about an exercise in power.

I don't understand why anyone still supports JY.
Sick, creepy behaviour.

JY's K.Farms thread is fast moving today!

I agree that the attire is relevant.

The Clapham Tranny (their name for themselves, not mine MNHQ) sits in the children’s section of a library local to me in bikini bottoms, papier-mâché boobs and a see through top despite being very vocal about hating children. It’s a dominance display. I can do what I like and no one dare stop me.

That sounds like a mental health issue to be completely honest. Nothing more.

And I see that the person who attacked a 16 year old women with a hammer was fined for the attack. Now I’m pretty sure this is the attack that was in the press recently and the woman in question was not born a woman.

It was noted that they had homophobic abuse thrown at them and their wife in a hospital car park, and they attacked the young woman with a hammer.

Nowhere in the news report I read did it say that this person was trans. Nor did they say that there was any ‘transphobic abuse’ thrown at them, which is what I would have expected the abuse to have been (it would be the first insult to hand surely?). Nor did it note the attackers past advisory role to the police on LGB+ matters.

This will be noted as a female crime stat.

It seems as if the reporting is ignoring or hiding the trans element. Often there are hints in reporting. Why is this - this is usually the first thing they leap upon as a ‘phobia’.

Why state that the verbal abuse given was anti-lesbian? To harm purposely lesbians - pushing the ‘angry butch lesbian’ stereotype? To reinforce that this was a woman who has abuse thrown at them? To damage lesbian image and hide male pattern offending in male-borns?

It was noted that they had homophobic abuse thrown at them and their wife in a hospital car park, and they attacked the young woman with a hammer

Yes, saw that report......I'm imagining the " homophobic abuse" was meant to disguise "transphobic abuse", because if the report had said transphobic, everyone would have known what their eyes told them to be true - and that is that the attacker was , in fact, male.

I think this is the attacker directing this; not the newspaper. Any journalist reporting on this would surely have said 'transphobic'.

Indeed. I’m very suspicious of the agenda here.

Is it also true that male ‘women’ sex offenders aren’t treated the same as male offenders because there just aren’t the facilities of ‘women sex offenders’?