Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Debbie Hayton in the TES

109 replies

NeurotrashWarrior · 10/05/2019 11:15

https://twitter.com/debbiehayton/status/1126712166466244610?s=21

I can't access it as not a subscriber but thanks Debbie for promoting trans gender trend's pack.

Getting this into the TES is very much needed.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
truthisarevolutionaryact · 14/05/2019 14:10

NeurotrashWarrior

I completely agree. There's a reason so many schools have been 'regulatory captured' by the trans groups targeting them. With the government refusing to stand up for the rights and safety of children schools have been easy meat for them to use to promote parental alienation, roll back safeguarding and misrepresent the law. Few teachers will be brave enough (or even knowledgeable enough) to stand up to some unqualified zealot telling them that anything other than uncritical acceptance of TWAW is transphobic.

This is a massively important article as it openly identifies the issues of risk to children - and safeguarding is one thing that teachers universally understand.

NeurotrashWarrior · 14/05/2019 14:27

Easy meat - absolutely.

Especially when people like Devon apparently visit 3 schools a week with this kind of bunkum:

Oh hindsight is a wonderful thing isn't it?

www.tes.com/news/transphobes-are-driving-childrens-confusion-about-gender-not-trans-community-or-their

Anti-trans voices broadly fall into two camps, the first being a kind of grunting incredulity and a refusal to accept transgenderism as a phenomenon, which tends to come from the political right wing. The second is TERFS (trans exclusionary radical feminists) who believe that the social acknowledgment of transgender women threatens the hard-won rights and status of people who were born women, and they tend to be on the left. Both weave elaborate webs in an attempt to disguise what is, in reality, simple transphobia. Yet, as Owen Jones recently pointed out in a piece for thee Guardianan^, they are dusting off the exact same arguments that were used to protest against the abolishment of Section 288_ back in 2003.
These include but are not limited to:

1. 'It’s a mental illness'
The same people who once claimed being gay was a "perversion" that needed to be "cured", rather than "encouraged", now say that those with "gender dysphoria" need "sympathy and therapeutic support", as opposed to being allowed to live their lives according to their true gender identity.

Ignoring the wide variety of possible traumatic experiences and co morbid mh issues many yp have with GD.

What does living a true GI mean exactly?

5. ‘They can’t take it back’
The "what if children wrongly think they’re gay and say it and try it and hate it?" brigade are now claiming that "children as young as 5 are being offered gender realignment surgery". I cannot say this loudly enough: there is absolutely no evidence for this. Psychologists and endocrinologists are generally reluctant to provide hormone therapy to anyone under the age of 16, and obtaining sex realignment surgery prior to the age of 18 is almost impossible in most countries throughout the world. Furthermore, transgender people,,_ who know only too well the pain and distress associated with being in the wrong body, are the last people who would encourage gender realignment on a whim.

Ummm well. I don't need to comment much on this bit...

Not much on safeguarding there. Healthy dollop of cognitive dissonance. I know which piece I'd take heed of if I were a HT. plus it's also sympathetic and inclusive of trans identifying young people too.

OP posts:
NeurotrashWarrior · 14/05/2019 14:28

Formatting fails, this is my line:

_Ignoring the wide variety of possible traumatic experiences and co morbid mh issues many yp have with GD.

What does living a true GI mean exactly?_

And

Ummm well. I don't need to comment much on this bit...

Not much on safeguarding there. Healthy dollop of cognitive dissonance. I know which piece I'd take heed of if I were a HT. plus it's also sympathetic and inclusive of trans identifying young people too.

OP posts:
NeurotrashWarrior · 14/05/2019 14:31

I need to point out that Natasha Devon is calling us t*fs; this is a direct quote from her TES column last year.

OP posts:
NeurotrashWarrior · 14/05/2019 14:35

She's a funny one.

Here she seems to almost get it.
^
www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/james-obrien/what-natasha-devon-really-said-dont-say-girls-boys/
^

OP posts:
continuallychargingmyphone · 14/05/2019 17:59

I met the woman a few years ago and ‘narcissistic’ doesn’t even begin to describe it.

KatvonHostileExtremist · 14/05/2019 18:06

I'm glad I'm a trf. If being a trf stops just one child from making a choice like in this screenshot. A massively traumatised, abused child, making that choice.

Glad the voices of people like Natasha are shrieking into the void.

Debbie Hayton in the TES
NeurotrashWarrior · 14/05/2019 19:53

Jesus. I saw that on the times thread; I can't believe that's an aspiration.

OP posts:
NeurotrashWarrior · 14/05/2019 19:53

Cont, she comes across like that.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.