The abstract of the opening speech is horrifying. Here it is:
Background
Despite a trajectory of reform, transgender people continue to face numerous problems in European societies: violence, workplace discrimination, inadequate healthcare ... the list goes on (and on). However, and importantly, these and other material realities are underscored by a prior violence, what we might call an ontological wound. I am speaking here of the denial of gender identity. Many other concrete problems can be viewed as symptoms of this deeper refusal, at the level of civil society, if not the state, to recognise us as properly gendered, and therefore as fully human.
Methods
In order to illuminate this problem, my lecture will focus on an example from the UK, one that serves both to dramatise the problem and to emphasis the stakes for trans people. The example I will explore is one borne of material reality: the criminal prosecution of young trans and other gender non-conforming youth for not disclosing their gender histories prior to intimacy (list of cases). All of these defendants were convicted, most have received custodial sentences, and all have been placed on the Sex Offenders Register.
Results and Conclusions
The lecture will provide a series of arguments against the bringing of such prosecutions for what is, after all, desire-led intimacy. To that end, it will, in addition to considering privacy and non-discrimination rights, interrogate the key criminal law and philosophical concepts of consent, harm and deception, and will reveal the cisnormative frame through which each is constructed. Ultimately, the test of our humanity might best be gauged at such sites of desire and their disavowal, at the point where trans and cis bodies most intimately touch.
Jesus fucking Christ that's rapey bollocks! 