Lass as I said I don’t dispute the care you had and so long as you and the baby were well and happy it is immaterial.
I did want to highlight that postnatal care has been significantly downgraded from having daily visits as a matter of course, written in the rules, to being lucky if you get one at all.
To me it is all part of a narrative chipping away at women’s rights and needs from many directions.
You have women like Cherie Blair boasting of going back to work after two weeks - leaving aside most women aren’t in high earning jobs that can finance the back office support for this, the nanny and the cleaner etc, but many women need significantly longer to recover physically and mentally. The husband of the woman who died in the link I posted admitted he had got cross with her for being ill as he wanted to be out and about parading the baby around. She was dying of sepsis!
But this is all downplayed, women are meant to snap back into their jeans, off to work, baby farmed out to a nursery, breastfeeding a thing of the past. Who gains from reduced rates of breastfeeding? Baby milk manufacturers and employers for starters.
So why bother with maternity leave? Oh right, let’s cut back and make a saving there.
Who is losing out ? Women and babies.
Then we have the “It’s the 21st century, grow up and stop being so inhibited/prudish of course a man can do the job” brigade - but normalising it means that women who object whether for reasons of modesty/religion/prior abuse or whatever are made to feel troublesome and not given an opportunity to object. In which case why should anyone object to unisex loos and changing rooms? It’s the 21st century. Biology doesn’t matter any more.
And if popping out a baby is no trouble to a woman then there should be no problem with women renting out their wombs, providing surrogacy services for the growing number of people who want to avail themselves of the gestational services of another woman.
Women and babies losing out every time.