Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Hayden and their latest case

999 replies

Amalfimamma · 08/04/2019 12:59

So this is the latest message to intimidate after their idea to compile a list of gc women

Hayden and their latest case
Hayden and their latest case
OP posts:
Thread gallery
70
placemats · 08/04/2019 14:20

You will face the legal consequences of your actions.

Touchy much? Howling with laughter. I'm more enraged if I don't get my delivery in the slot promised to me.

littlbrowndog · 08/04/2019 14:20

Me too 😂😂😂

Needmoresleep · 08/04/2019 14:22

Jacky I think Steph has previously spoken about her obtaining a GRC.

JessicaWakefieldSV · 08/04/2019 14:22

You can also talk spent convictions under certain circumstances, esp if the person has a conviction relating to dishonesty, if they are engaging in similar activity to what the person was convicted for, or if it is in the public interest. They just dropped their case against Glinner so this is literally just a scare tactic.

placemats · 08/04/2019 14:23

Strums fingers and head out. Delivery isn't happening today.

Awaits court order.

JessicaWakefieldSV · 08/04/2019 14:23

Jacky I think Steph has previously spoken about her obtaining a GRC.

A claim that considering prev dishonesty issues may not be true.

ColeHawlins · 08/04/2019 14:23

What did I get deleted for? Not respecting the Male-bodied person's pronouns?

They'd get more sympathy if they stopped trying to bully everyone.

placemats · 08/04/2019 14:27

Off now but had to post.

I think Steph has previously spoken about her obtaining a GRC.

I would no more believe Steph than I would my delivery order slot.

Adios amigos.

Amalfimamma · 08/04/2019 14:30

I think Steph has previously spoken about her obtaining a GRC.

Steph has indeed. Watch this space Biscuit

OP posts:
JackyHolyoake · 08/04/2019 14:33

Would it not be better if we ignore that person completely .. no tweets, no posts .. nothing .. that person ceases to exist.

Amalfimamma · 08/04/2019 14:34

The GMC are watching ades.

Hayden and their latest case
OP posts:
Amalfimamma · 08/04/2019 14:35

And what fun would that be Jacky?

OP posts:
JessicaWakefieldSV · 08/04/2019 14:45

Grin targeted harassment? People talking about you on the internet in your absence, is not harassment you fools. I’m not going to be intimidated by these misogynists. SH & AH followed a twitter account that made a sick rape rap about a member of this forum and they have the absolute nerve to try and intimidate us with baseless threats? You’re not being harassed, you’re not here, stop stalking us and you wont even see it. They have had no defamation claim upheld here, it’s merely an application for the release of what is likely a fake email and fake name, which was not contested by MN. I mean, are they really this silly to think this means anything? To continue to make jokes about golf when we know SH has a conviction involving a gold club is pretty sick and disturbed behaviour.

JackyHolyoake · 08/04/2019 14:46

Amalfimamma

It would mean we are not a source of narcissistic supply, perhaps?

DancingRaven · 08/04/2019 14:48

I would be very interested to know what the courts think about documents constantly being splashed over twitter in a bid to intimidate and silence women?

PerfPower · 08/04/2019 14:49

I don't know about anyone else, but I'm fair shitting maself.

HellAndDegenerates · 08/04/2019 14:49

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Amalfimamma · 08/04/2019 14:50

JackyHolyoake

Then Steph gets frustrated and takes out their narc rage on some poor Twitter user.

St least here we can laugh about their outbursts and not rise to the bait when they take the time and effort to sign up to try and rile us up

And it backfires on them. 😂

OP posts:
whatsthecomingoverthehill · 08/04/2019 14:51

Out of interest, how much does it cost to make such an application to the court?

Amalfimamma · 08/04/2019 14:52

A list of vexatious litigants does exist..... And the criteria to be listed on there has been met 😉

OP posts:
JessicaWakefieldSV · 08/04/2019 14:52

It would mean we are not a source of narcissistic supply, perhaps?

I totally get that and agree to some extent usually. But SH is trying to scare us into not talking about them and their harmful behaviour, which includes the relentless harrassmemt of Caroline. I also think it’s important we all understand exactly what this uncontested court order actually means, so that people aren’t intimidated by an actual non-thing. It’s not a successful defamation claim, SH hasn’t had a single one of those. They’re literally showing off about being given the private details of a user, which are likely not their true identify if they had any sense, for no real purpose since they’ve already dropped a defamation case against Glinner. It’s important this is spelt out clearly.

Then we can ignore them. They’re kinda boring tbh, same ridiculous baseless tweeting

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 08/04/2019 14:54

It's not a lot, which is good for democratising the use of law, but enables vexatious litigants.

GeordieGenes · 08/04/2019 14:54

Btw: Stephanie is watching this thread ( they has posted screenshots on Twitter), so please be careful. Sad

JessicaWakefieldSV · 08/04/2019 14:54

Costs of court applications

www.compactlaw.co.uk/compactlaw-admin/court-fees.html

HavelockVetinari · 08/04/2019 14:55

Gosh, (s)he's obsessed with us!