Hayden and their latest case

[Amalfimamma]

So this is the latest message to intimidate after their idea to compile a list of gc women

I'm confused and wonder if anyone can clarify. Is Hayden's legal action to get identify details the result of an offensive comment on MN (which seems doubtful as MN mods tend to delete the most inoffensive comments imaginable)? Or did the person they're pursuing make an allegation against Hayden that is entirely false? Again, seems doubtful as the mods are so hot on deleting such things.

Can anyone elucidate?

They've changed it - it says that MN broke the court order and complied 1 HR 21 mins late or something

We need a DJ Khaled meme

Hayden was one of the TSvoices people (short lived transsexuals against self ID group: here’s Miranda’s take on it: mirandayardley.com/en/transsexual-voices-matter/

I might be misremembering, but I think Rose of Dawn has mentioned, in a video, that SH was a big reason as to why the group was short-lived. I get the impression that SH is not much of a team player 🙊

As far as I am aware, most of the original group members are still working on how to get out from under the trans umbrella, either individually or collectively.

I'm confused and wonder if anyone can clarify.

From what I have got from the rumours flying around the individual was the first person on MN to link to the court document showing Hayden's past offences.?

I'm not sure why Hayden has jumped to the conclusion that mumsnet's 'inflammatory troll' is them?

Saying they don't want to spend time moderating an inflammatory troll, to me, was referring to the poster whose details Hayden has demanded.

I'm not sure why Hayden has jumped to the conclusion that mumsnet's 'inflammatory troll' is them?

Because MN has banned them?

Was Steph too busy slagging off MN on twitter to check in box.

Getting too excited at the thought of MN ignoring the order, so Steph could have a crack at MNs proper lawyers? I'm sure that would end well for Steph..

It's more Blazing Saddles than High Noon.grin

Great email, MNHQ.

I thought the other person was a friend of the first person. Not sure where I got that idea from. That would be a very daft and childish thing to do - orchestrating action against a website?

I might be misremembering, but I think Rose of Dawn has mentioned, in a video, that SH was a big reason as to why the group was short-lived. I get the impression that SH is not much of a team player

Hayden said:

twitter.com/i/moments/1032751041215954946

Roll on Friday have an account here:

www.rollonfriday.com/news-content/exclusive-transgender-lawyer-calls-police-transexual-solicitor-harassment

hayden will have trouble persuading any judge that MN committed any kind of 'crime' even if the email was late. Hayden has it now.

That email is a masterpiece.

Go @MNHQ!

Go @JustineMumsnet!

More balls than Millwall

Because MN has banned them?

They've also deleted the other poster's comments. I just think it's interesting that Hayden immediately jumped to it being them.

I also love how they are very keen to make everyone know that mumsnet were not 'invited' to give the useless information, but told to. Because Hayden is Very Important.

'It was to do with Mumsnet being socially irresponsible in allowing there forum to be used for such serious allegation of serious criminality which are entirely untrue.'

Eh? I thought the convictions mentioned in the document were spent which isn't the same as entirely untrue and as there was an official document involved it was surely an honestly held opinion based on that document rather than an allegation....

Just seen the Daily Fail.

Why would anyone who calls the site Nuttersnet think they have the right to demand anything from it?
MNHQ complied with the court order.
They do not have to accept anyone as a member especially a person who uses social media to call it Nuttersnet

This transgender person is behaving like a spoiled brat.

I wonder if the DM has seen the document?

Oh that email from MNHQ is fucking glorious!

"Go well"

This would be very amusing indeed if it wasn't undoubtedly causing stress to people who are innocent of any wrongdoing. Unlike SH who may have no "current convictions" but is (pleasingly) drawing attention to the fact they have had convictions.

I would like to say one has the courage of their convictions, the other just has convictions, but surely someone has already said it

Anyone else cringing at that typo - 'there forum' instead of 'their forum'

And the DM doesn't let the opportunity of posting that video of Steph again pass them by

Oh that email is brilliant, just perfect!

I'm confused really as to what is going on now, but the way Hayden and Harrop are storming around on Twitter as if this is some sort of Watergate Scandal or something is quite funny really

MN 's email was a longer way of saying 'potato', wasn''t it?

I'm sure I saw somewhere that Hayden had been approached by the Telegraph as well as the Mail. I wonder is we should be expecting a story from them?