Caroline farrow support thread 2

[ilovejeffgoldblum]

Hi I'm a long time lurker, who read with disgust the last thread and wants to send , to caro. I've scanned since last thread finished for new one but no luck! Hope no one minds if I start one!

The Lawyer is thinking of Compiling lists eh? How very 1940s Germany.

Although it’s quite ironic that certain people don’t like their own previous names mentioned.

RedToothBrush

Thanks for the explanation I always find your posts very useful and informative.

No worries RedDogsBeg. I guess it's well-trodden ground that when one interacts with narcissists one needs to be just generally aware.

Thanks for the push nauticant, I sat on my hands on the other threads, will now revert to that position.

Database sounds amazing, I love being a hostile extremist! Sorry 🍌

Caro saw you on tv, you and your daughter came across really well. You can tell you have a fabulous relationship. I was like awwwww Caro. That's what it's all about. You've got something these pathetic individuals will never have.

Yeps for sure they get off on it

Nowt else to get off on tbh

That’s why they do it

Yet never see them on kiwifarms giving them shite

Oh no

Too cowardly

I know this has been said many times before but anyone thinking maybe the angry activists have a point and are simply defending trans rights. Just look towards their links.

It's not even 'six degres of separation' to their links to seriously disturbed people..

Joss Prior who is currently defaming and angrily shouting about Caro is happy to retweet Casey Eggsplosion (who NSPCC recognised too)

i never want to assume, but something's strongly telling me that Casey. a gamer, is likely to be in their parents' house this evening sending shit texts to people they don't know
twitter.com/CaseyExplosion/status/1114157765428224000

So interesting, this strange and regular correlation between male gamers. trans rights activism, and attacking women. I wonder why...(oh, no, hang on, we know!)

littlebrowndog it would be the funniest thing to see some of these types try to take on the kiwis.

Casey is a "furry" with much dubious info on their twitter account. Identifies as a sloth apparently, with she/her pronouns.

I'm actually fairly worried for the puppy shown in their recent twitter pics.

I'm not kidding.

There is very long threads on people on kiwi farms. They dig down deep and match up” links

Very very interesting reading

littl I agree, and it's only one or two clicks away on most of these 'warriors' against Caro where you get to see exactly who they are. you don't even need KiwiFarms to do any digging.

Any reasonable person who thinks 'oh, Caroline seems mean' if they did one or two clicks further into the people they're 'listening' to, they should be concerned too. it's really not that difficult to see, very quickly, where many of these abusive people, claiming 'trans rights' status, are really coming from.

https://twitter.com/flyinglawyer73/status/1114596948328239104?s=20

Pretty sure it wouldn't be legal. What's the lawful basis for processing such data? It's not consent, obviously.

The lawful bases for processing are set out in Article 6 of the GDPR. At least one of these must apply whenever you process personal data:
(a) Consent: the individual has given clear consent for you to process their personal data for a specific purpose.
(b) Contract: the processing is necessary for a contract you have with the individual, or because they have asked you to take specific steps before entering into a contract.
(c) Legal obligation: the processing is necessary for you to comply with the law (not including contractual obligations).
(d) Vital interests: the processing is necessary to protect someone’s life.
(e) Public task: the processing is necessary for you to perform a task in the public interest or for your official functions, and the task or function has a clear basis in law.
(f) Legitimate interests: the processing is necessary for your legitimate interests or the legitimate interests of a third party, unless there is a good reason to protect the individual’s personal data which overrides those legitimate interests. (This cannot apply if you are a public authority processing data to perform your official tasks.)

Not sure a Stasi like "Directory of Transphobes" run by Hayden would meet the fair processing requirements.

The lawful usage stuff is interesting.

Data must be used fairly and not to the detriment of people without a proper assessment which must be justifiable.

It's wholly unlawful.

Caro, sending support to you as I’m reading your Twitter feed and I’m truely shocked by the level of escalating abuse, harassment and intimidation you are receiving.

I think you are giving the lawyer/not lawyer (not sure) the benefit of the doubt in thinking they even read the law on GDPR let alone ever plan to satisfy it.

I’m remembering the whole debate about who to put on the back of the new notes. I can’t trmember who - but a woman suggested that a woman should go on the back. She received a barrage to trolley and threats and at least 2 idiots went to jail (including one woman - a real one who thought she was a woman - dingdong who sent rape threats).

How was this different to what is happening here? Why are the police shrugging and saying (like in the old days) ‘just a domestic nothing to see here’ and doing nothing?

sacrifice I know damn well they hadn't / haven't.

That's why I checked what the law was.

Let's see how things are going so far.

By increasing the intensity of the harassment of Caroline Farrow they're publicising their campaign and motivating many people to give her their support. Including people who wouldn't be natural allies of hers.

They're motivating people to find out more about the harassment campaign who then find out that the most informative source of information on the harassers is Kiwifarms so they're driving traffic to that site and increasing the spread of information there to other parts of the Internet.

When I'm feeling optimistic I think the likeliest thing that will fatally undermine the gender identity ideology will be the TRAs themselves.

It’s like a gang of school bullies. Bit these are ‘adults’ and surely can be prosecuted. But the police refuse to act. Why is this?

I think you are giving the lawyer/not lawyer (not sure) the benefit of the doubt in thinking they even read the law on GDPR let alone ever plan to satisfy it.

The lawyer says they feel it is a legal use of personal data. I'm not convinced by their expertise in this field. There are 6 lawful bases under GDPR. This would not meet them. You have to have a very good reason for processing personal data without consent.

You have to have a very good reason for processing personal data without consent.

Is that why Lily Madigan had to disband their database, all of a sudden?

The law already laid this out but GDPR tightened it up even more and jacked up the potential fines for breach stratospherically.

GDPR specifically references "online identifiers" like MN usernames and "jigsaw identification" which data processors have to be careful they don't enable.

Political allegiance is considered as sensitive personal data as is your health records.