Guardian vulvas...

[Alicethroughtheblackmirror]

It's there anything female the Guardian covers without feeling the need to include a male?

Surgical constructions are not the same as the female sex organs and it's insulting they have to be included in a feature on vulvas. Of 8 examples here, one is a male...

Me and my vulva: 100 women reveal all

www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/feb/09/me-and-my-vulva-100-women-reveal-all-photographs?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard

I'm a Twitter novice so this might not be correct.

I saw that someone had been inspired to write a piece calling him a cunt (it's a vagina actually) but I've forgotten who it was!

mobile.twitter.com/paulbullen/status/1094738460475219968

brilliant thank you

www.thepoke.co.uk/2019/02/11/chap-tried-mansplain-difference-vulva-vagina-takedowns-brutal/

I'm loving this. While this is breaking the internet, thousands will be reading the article.

Yes there's a few issues - I was taken aback at the number of completely hairless vulvas and it's a shame one's had cosmetic surgery; it would be great to see all sizes. Then, yes ok a TW is in there. I would ultimately prefer all women.

Except, it's got us talking. And they've categorically stating that they can't claim womanhood. Or that she have a vagina. Not TWAW. Unlike sooooo many we know of.

Just brilliant.

Rubbish grammatical typos, sorry!

I’ve been holding this in all afternoon at work since I read that twitter at lunchtime so please excuse me..

BWAHAHAHA! Hahahaha. Haaaaaaaah. Omigod stop! Hehehe.
Ha ha.

..ahem, now, where we?